Davies Thandi, Lund Crick, Schneider Marguerite
Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa.
King's Global Health Institute, Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
SSM Ment Health. 2022 Dec;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100056. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Perinatal depression carries significant levels of disability for both women and their infants, but there is a large treatment gap for this condition in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this gap, task-sharing using community health workers (CHWs) to provide psychosocial interventions for perinatal depression is increasingly common. Many of these interventions have shown significant positive effects on maternal mood, however not all have done so. This study used data from a task-shared psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression in Cape Town, South Africa, the 'Africa Focus on Intervention Research for Mental Health' (AFFIRM-SA) randomised controlled trial (RCT). It aimed to examine the processes that occurred within the delivery of the counselling intervention, and to use these findings to provide recommendations for psychosocial task sharing in LMICs. A grounded theory analysis was conducted of 234 counselling session transcripts from 39 randomly selected participants from the RCT. This revealed that the effectiveness of the intervention was compromised by the negative influence of participants' socio-economic context, and by counselling strategies that did not align with what was intended in the counselling manual. Despite this, participants provided spontaneous accounts of improvement in mood and cognition, and reasons for these improvements, interpreted as elements that were therapeutically effective for them. Most of these elements aligned with previously identified 'common elements' of therapy. Recommendations for future research and practice include conducting participatory formative research, using an iterative and responsive research design informed by implementation science, incorporating contextually appropriate strategies in interventions such as addressing social determinants of mental health, conducting intensive training and supervision, adopting a staged approach to managing depression, and using common elements of therapy as the basis for psychosocial interventions.
围产期抑郁症对女性及其婴儿都造成了严重的残疾,但在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),这种疾病的治疗差距很大。为了弥补这一差距,利用社区卫生工作者(CHWs)分担任务以提供围产期抑郁症心理社会干预的做法越来越普遍。其中许多干预措施已显示出对产妇情绪有显著的积极影响,但并非所有措施都如此。本研究使用了来自南非开普敦一项针对围产期抑郁症的任务分担心理社会干预的数据,即“非洲心理健康干预研究重点”(AFFIRM-SA)随机对照试验(RCT)。其目的是研究咨询干预实施过程中发生的情况,并利用这些结果为低收入和中等收入国家的心理社会任务分担提供建议。对随机选取的39名来自RCT的参与者的234份咨询会话记录进行了扎根理论分析。结果显示,参与者的社会经济背景的负面影响以及与咨询手册预期不符的咨询策略损害了干预措施的有效性。尽管如此,参与者自发讲述了情绪和认知的改善情况以及这些改善的原因,这些被视为对他们有治疗效果的因素。其中大多数因素与先前确定的治疗“共同因素”相符。对未来研究和实践的建议包括开展参与式形成性研究,采用基于实施科学的迭代和响应式研究设计,在干预措施中纳入因地制宜的策略,如解决心理健康的社会决定因素,进行强化培训和监督,采用分阶段方法管理抑郁症,以及将治疗的共同因素作为心理社会干预的基础。