Szigethy Eva M, Murphy Sean M, Ehrlich Orna G, Heller Caren A, Engel-Nitz Nicole M, Meadows Perry, Allen John I
Department of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Apr 14;3(2):otab021. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otab021. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Opioid use by patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with poorer health outcomes. This study describes socioeconomic characteristics; health utilization trends; and costs of patients with IBD and either no opioid prescriptions, or in 1 of 3 opioid duration categories based on Center for Disease Control guidelines: acute (0-30 days), moderate (31-90 days), or chronic (>90 days). We utilized the Cost of IBD Care Optum research database results for this study.
The Optum Research Database from years 2007 to 2016 including IBD patients with commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance in the United States was used. Additional inclusion criteria included continuous enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefit coverage for at least 24 months (12 months before and 12 months after the index date of IBD diagnosis). The association between costs and patient characteristics were assessed across a no opioid use group during this period and the 3 opioid duration groups.
Among 51,178 IBD patients, 33,229 (64.93%) were part of the no opioid use group, while 13,635 (26.64%) were in acute, 1698 (3.32%) were in moderate, and 2616 (5.11%) were in chronic use groups, as determined by pharmacy claims data. Patients in the chronic group were more likely to be white (75.38%) compared to all the other groups (no opioid use, acute, and moderate), have attained less education (only high school diploma), have had lower incomes, and have had Medicare instead of commercial insurance. Patients across all opioid prescription groups were more likely to have had diagnoses associated with pain in the prior year, with rates increasing by the length of opioid prescription (63.68%, 80.17%, and 86.11% for acute, moderate, and chronic groups). Compared to the no-use group, the acute group had more ambulatory (outpatient) visits, while the chronic group had fewer. Emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations were higher in all 3 opioid groups compared to the no opioid use group. Ambulatory, emergency department, inpatient, and total (medical + pharmacy) costs were higher in all 3 opioid groups, compared to the no opioid use group, even after adjusting for demographic and clinical patient characteristics.
Among patients with IBD, increasing opioid use was associated with higher healthcare resource utilization and, concomitantly, higher healthcare costs during this period.
炎症性肠病(IBD)患者使用阿片类药物与较差的健康结局相关。本研究描述了社会经济特征、医疗利用趋势,以及IBD患者(未开具阿片类药物处方者,或根据疾病控制中心指南分为3个阿片类药物使用时长类别之一的患者:急性(0 - 30天)、中度(31 - 90天)或慢性(>90天))的费用情况。我们利用IBD护理成本Optum研究数据库的结果进行本研究。
使用2007年至2016年的Optum研究数据库,其中包括美国有商业保险或医疗保险优势计划的IBD患者。其他纳入标准包括连续参保医疗和药房福利至少24个月(IBD诊断索引日期前12个月和后12个月)。在此期间,评估无阿片类药物使用组与3个阿片类药物使用时长组之间费用与患者特征的关联。
在51,178例IBD患者中,33,229例(64.93%)属于无阿片类药物使用组,而根据药房报销数据确定,13,635例(26.64%)为急性使用组,1698例(3.32%)为中度使用组,2616例(5.11%)为慢性使用组。与所有其他组(无阿片类药物使用、急性和中度使用组)相比,慢性使用组患者更可能为白人(75.38%),受教育程度较低(仅高中文凭),收入较低,且拥有医疗保险而非商业保险。所有阿片类药物处方组的患者在前一年更可能有与疼痛相关的诊断,且随着阿片类药物处方时长增加发生率上升(急性、中度和慢性组分别为63.68%、80.17%和86.11%)。与未使用组相比,急性使用组门诊(门诊)就诊次数更多,而慢性使用组较少。与无阿片类药物使用组相比,所有3个阿片类药物组的急诊科就诊和住院次数均更高。即使在调整了人口统计学和临床患者特征后,所有3个阿片类药物组的门诊、急诊科、住院和总(医疗 + 药房)费用均高于无阿片类药物使用组。
在IBD患者中,阿片类药物使用增加与更高的医疗资源利用相关,在此期间也伴随着更高的医疗费用。