Suppr超能文献

P068:全国性炎症性肠病退伍军人队列中急性护理利用方面的种族和社会经济差异

P068 Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Acute Care Utilization in a National Cohort of Veterans With IBD.

作者信息

Booth Alexander, Keller Everette, Forster Erin, Axon Robert, Magwood Gayenell, Curran Thomas

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina and the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, United States.

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S18. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798872.15657.44.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitalizations for Black patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased in recent decades though our understanding of disease behavior in Black patients remains limited and concerns related to healthcare equity persist. Existing data are largely drawn from small case series at IBD referral centers or national registries lacking granular longitudinal outpatient data. Our aim was to determine whether there are racial or socioeconomic disparities in acute care utilization as measured by hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits within a large national cohort of IBD patients.

METHODS

National Veterans Heath Administration (VHA) data were used to examine baseline disease characteristics and two years of utilization following an index outpatient gastroenterology visit for Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in 2017. To account for patients more likely to access care outside the VHA, we excluded those with less than four unique VHA encounters per year. We compared differences in comorbidity burden [Charlson comorbidity index, (CCI)], disease duration, surgical history and modifiable IBD severity risk factors (opioid use, tobacco use, biologic agent use, anemia, malnutrition) based on race and area deprivation index (ADI), a multidimensional marker for regional socioeconomic status (SES). Negative binomial regression was used to model demographic and clinical risk factors associated with hospitalization and ED visits.

RESULTS

19,442 patients (47.4% with CD and 52.6% with UC) were included: 14% Black, 5% Hispanic and 76% White. Compared to White patients, Black patients were younger, more likely to have anemia, perianal disease, and be in the bottom quartile of ADI; they were less likely to have a history of intestinal resection. IBD type, disease duration, CCI, and rates of tobacco use, opioid use, and malnutrition were not different between Black and White patients. On bivariate analysis, Black patients had increased mean and median ED visits compared to White patients (mean 4.48 vs 3.32; p < 0.001) though no differences were seen in hospitalizations (mean 0.96 vs 0.92; p=NS). On stepwise multivariable modeling, hospitalization and ED utilization were significantly higher among Black patients when controlling for age, sex, type of IBD, and disease duration [OR for hospitalization: 1.114 (95% CI: 1.046-1.199); OR for ED visit: 1.191 (95% CI: 1.125-1.261)]. After sequential adjustment for CCI and modifiable IBD severity risk factors, no differences in hospitalizations were seen between Black and White patients. In the full model for ED visits including adjustments for modifiable IBD severity risk factors (all significant), Black race was significantly associated with increased frequency of ED access [OR: 1.261 (95% CI: 1.19-1.336)], while ADI was not.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis of a large national outpatient cohort of patients with IBD, we identified significant racial differences in IBD disease behavior, anemia and subsequent acute care utilization. Racial differences in hospitalization were not significant after controlling for modifiable IBD risk factors suggesting actionable targets to mitigate the observed disparities. However, Black race was independently associated with ED utilization even in a healthcare system where access to care is theoretically similar. Future studies should investigate factors underlying increased ED utilization among Black IBD patients in further detail.

摘要

背景

近几十年来,患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的黑人患者住院率有所上升,尽管我们对黑人患者疾病行为的了解仍然有限,且与医疗公平相关的问题依然存在。现有数据大多来自IBD转诊中心的小病例系列或缺乏详细纵向门诊数据的国家登记处。我们的目的是确定在一大群全国性IBD患者中,以住院和急诊就诊衡量的急性护理利用方面是否存在种族或社会经济差异。

方法

利用国家退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的数据,检查2017年克罗恩病(CD)或溃疡性结肠炎(UC)门诊胃肠病学就诊后的基线疾病特征和两年的利用情况。为了考虑更有可能在VHA系统之外接受治疗的患者,我们排除了每年VHA就诊次数少于4次的患者。我们根据种族和地区贫困指数(ADI)(一种区域社会经济地位(SES)的多维指标)比较了合并症负担[查尔森合并症指数(CCI)]、疾病持续时间、手术史和可改变的IBD严重程度风险因素(阿片类药物使用、烟草使用、生物制剂使用、贫血、营养不良)的差异。采用负二项回归对与住院和急诊就诊相关的人口统计学和临床风险因素进行建模。

结果

纳入19442例患者(47.4%为CD患者,52.6%为UC患者):14%为黑人,5%为西班牙裔,76%为白人。与白人患者相比,黑人患者更年轻,更易患贫血、肛周疾病,且处于ADI的最低四分位数;他们肠道切除史的可能性较小。黑人与白人患者在IBD类型、疾病持续时间、CCI以及烟草使用、阿片类药物使用和营养不良发生率方面无差异。在双变量分析中,与白人患者相比,黑人患者的急诊就诊平均次数和中位数增加(平均4.48次对3.32次;p < 0.001),但住院次数无差异(平均0.96次对0.92次;p = 无显著性差异)。在逐步多变量建模中,在控制年龄、性别、IBD类型和疾病持续时间后,黑人患者的住院和急诊利用率显著更高[住院的比值比:1.114(95%置信区间:1.046 - 1.199);急诊就诊的比值比:1.191(95%置信区间:1.125 - 1.261)]。在依次调整CCI和可改变的IBD严重程度风险因素后,黑人和白人患者的住院次数无差异。在包括可改变的IBD严重程度风险因素调整(均有显著性)的急诊就诊完整模型中,黑人种族与急诊就诊频率增加显著相关[比值比:1.261(95%置信区间:1.19 - (此处原文有误,应为1.190)1.336)],而ADI则不然。

结论

在对一大群全国性IBD门诊患者的分析中,我们发现IBD疾病行为以及贫血和随后的急性护理利用方面存在显著的种族差异。在控制可改变的IBD风险因素后,住院方面的种族差异不显著,这表明有可采取行动的目标来减轻观察到的差异。然而,即使在理论上获得医疗服务相似的医疗系统中,黑人种族仍与急诊利用独立相关。未来的研究应更详细地调查黑人IBD患者急诊利用增加的潜在因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验