• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸟类根据其起源栖息地和性别,对视觉和嗅觉觅食线索进行不同程度的优先排序。

Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex.

作者信息

Rubene Diana, Low Matthew, Brodin Anders

机构信息

Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 8;10(2):221336. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221336. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.221336
PMID:36778952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9905992/
Abstract

Animals interpret their environment by combining information from multiple senses. The relative usefulness of different senses may vary between species, habitats and sexes; yet, how multimodal stimuli are integrated and prioritized is unknown for most taxa. We experimentally assessed foraging preferences of great tits () to test whether urban and forest individuals prioritize visual and olfactory cues differently during foraging. We trained 13 wild-caught birds to associate multimodal (colour + odour) cues with a food reward and assessed their foraging preferences in a cue-separation test. In this, the birds could choose between the multimodal training cue and its olfactory or visual components. Our results suggest that the birds did not perceive multimodal cues in an integrated way, as their response was not stronger than for unimodal cue components. Urban birds preferred olfactory cues, while forest birds preferred visual cues. Nevertheless, female birds preferred the multimodal cue, while males foraged more randomly with respect to which cue was present. These findings contribute to our understanding of the relative roles of vision and olfaction in bird foraging behaviour. Future work should focus on how habitat- and sex-specific sensory prioritization modifies bird foraging behaviour and foraging success in the context of urban adaptations across populations.

摘要

动物通过整合来自多种感官的信息来解读它们的环境。不同感官的相对有用性可能因物种、栖息地和性别而异;然而,对于大多数分类群来说,多模态刺激是如何整合和排序的尚不清楚。我们通过实验评估了大山雀()的觅食偏好,以测试城市和森林中的个体在觅食过程中是否对视觉和嗅觉线索有不同的优先级。我们训练了13只野生捕获的鸟类,使其将多模态(颜色+气味)线索与食物奖励联系起来,并在线索分离测试中评估它们的觅食偏好。在这个测试中,鸟类可以在多模态训练线索及其嗅觉或视觉成分之间进行选择。我们的结果表明,鸟类并没有以整合的方式感知多模态线索,因为它们的反应并不比单模态线索成分更强。城市鸟类更喜欢嗅觉线索,而森林鸟类更喜欢视觉线索。然而,雌鸟更喜欢多模态线索,而雄鸟在有哪种线索存在时觅食更随机。这些发现有助于我们理解视觉和嗅觉在鸟类觅食行为中的相对作用。未来的工作应关注栖息地和性别特异性感官优先级如何在种群适应城市的背景下改变鸟类的觅食行为和觅食成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/a87fa208ca00/rsos221336f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/c0402b24b86b/rsos221336f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/1ebbe8fa96d3/rsos221336f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/3500ced5f17a/rsos221336f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/a87fa208ca00/rsos221336f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/c0402b24b86b/rsos221336f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/1ebbe8fa96d3/rsos221336f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/3500ced5f17a/rsos221336f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a0/9905992/a87fa208ca00/rsos221336f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Birds differentially prioritize visual and olfactory foraging cues depending on habitat of origin and sex.鸟类根据其起源栖息地和性别,对视觉和嗅觉觅食线索进行不同程度的优先排序。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 8;10(2):221336. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221336. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Disentangling olfactory and visual information used by field foraging birds.解析野外觅食鸟类所使用的嗅觉和视觉信息。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Dec 11;9(1):545-552. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4773. eCollection 2019 Jan.
3
Negotiating a noisy, information-rich environment in search of cryptic prey: olfactory predators need patchiness in prey cues.在嘈杂、信息丰富的环境中进行搜索,以寻找隐藏的猎物:嗅觉捕食者需要猎物线索的斑块状分布。
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Jul;80(4):742-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01817.x. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
4
UV light perception is modulated by the odour element of an olfactory-visual compound in restrained honeybees.在受限制的蜜蜂中,紫外线光的感知受到嗅觉-视觉复合气味成分的调节。
J Exp Biol. 2019 May 28;222(Pt 10):jeb201483. doi: 10.1242/jeb.201483.
5
Insight of scent: experimental evidence of olfactory capabilities in the wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans).嗅觉的洞察力:漂泊信天翁(Diomedea exulans)嗅觉能力的实验证据。
J Exp Biol. 2010 Feb 15;213(4):558-63. doi: 10.1242/jeb.032979.
6
The importance of auditory, olfactory, and visual cues for insect foraging in owl monkeys (Aotus nancymaae).听觉、嗅觉和视觉线索对猫头鹰猴(Aotus nancymaae)觅食的重要性。
Am J Primatol. 2023 Oct;85(10):e23539. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23539. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
7
Dynamic multimodal interactions in navigating wood ants: what do path details tell us about cue integration?导航木蚁中的动态多模态相互作用:路径细节能告诉我们关于线索整合的什么信息?
J Exp Biol. 2020 Apr 3;223(Pt 7):jeb221036. doi: 10.1242/jeb.221036.
8
Older and wiser? Age differences in foraging and learning by an endangered passerine.更年长就更明智?一种濒危雀形目鸟类在觅食与学习方面的年龄差异
Behav Processes. 2018 Mar;148:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
Oceans of stimuli: an individual-based model to assess the role of olfactory cues and local enhancement in seabirds' foraging behaviour.海量刺激:评估嗅觉线索和局部增强在海鸟觅食行为中的作用的个体基础模型。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Jul;23(4):629-642. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01368-1. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
Niche shift in three foraging insectivorous birds in lowland Malaysian forest patches.马来西亚低地森林斑块中三种食虫觅食鸟类的生态位转移。
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Weighting of sensory cues reflect changing patterns of visual investment during ecological divergence in butterflies.感觉线索的加权反映了蝴蝶在生态分歧过程中视觉投资模式的变化。
Biol Lett. 2024 Oct;20(10):20240377. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0377. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
A global meta-analysis reveals higher variation in breeding phenology in urban birds than in their non-urban neighbours.一项全球性的荟萃分析显示,与非城市邻居相比,城市鸟类的繁殖物候学变化更大。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Nov;25(11):2552-2570. doi: 10.1111/ele.14099. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
Olfactory camouflage and communication in birds.鸟类的嗅觉伪装与交流
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Jun;97(3):1193-1209. doi: 10.1111/brv.12837. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
3
Great tits feed their nestlings with more but smaller prey items and fewer caterpillars in cities than in forests.
大山雀在城市中给雏鸟喂食的猎物更大但更小,且毛毛虫更少。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 17;11(1):24161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03504-4.
4
Low-rank Gallus gallus domesticus chicks are better at transitive inference reasoning.低等级的家鸡更擅长传递性推理。
Commun Biol. 2021 Dec 9;4(1):1344. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02855-y.
5
Learning and motor inhibitory control in crows and domestic chickens.乌鸦和家鸡的学习与运动抑制控制
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 20;8(10):210504. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210504. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Biologia Futura: adaptive changes in urban populations.未来生物学:城市人口的适应性变化。
Biol Futur. 2020 Jun;71(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s42977-020-00005-9. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
Olfactory detection of trace amounts of plant volatiles is correlated with testosterone in a passerine bird.在一种雀形目鸟类中,对微量植物挥发物的嗅觉检测与睾酮相关。
Horm Behav. 2021 Nov;136:105045. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2021.105045. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Smell proves powerful sense for birds.嗅觉对鸟类来说是一种强大的感官。
Science. 2021 Jul 9;373(6551):143-144. doi: 10.1126/science.373.6551.143.
9
Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent.感官污染物会改变鸟类的物候和适应能力,这种影响跨越整个大陆。
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7835):605-609. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Insectivorous birds can see and smell systemically herbivore-induced pines.食虫鸟类能够看到并嗅到遭受草食动物侵害的松树在全身散发的信号。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug 4;10(17):9358-9370. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6622. eCollection 2020 Sep.