Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb;15(1):135-144. doi: 10.4055/cios22084. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become the treatment of choice for the management of massive rotator cuff tears combined with cuff tear arthropathy, and many novel designs have been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of classic RTSA. This study sought to evaluate and compare RTSA outcomes among patients with cuff tear arthropathy treated by a medialized inlay humerus implant with a neck shaft angle of 155° or a lateralized onlay implant with a neck shaft angle of 145°.
A retrospective review of 32 inlay implants and 32 onlay implants was performed. The active range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, motor power for elevation and external rotation, and functional scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and Korean Shoulder Scoring system were assessed before surgery, at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up at least 24 months after surgery. Scapular notching, lateral humeral offset, and deltoid wrapping offset were assessed for radiographic evaluation.
The preoperative demographic data of both groups showed no significant differences ( > 0.05). The mean follow-up period was 24.9 months. Significant improvements in forward flexion, functional scores, and pain VAS score were observed in both groups at the last follow-up. No significant differences in ROM or functional scores were found between two groups at each time point, except that the onlay implant group exhibited a significantly greater range of external rotation at 3 and 12 months after surgery and at the last follow-up. The rate of scapular notching and the final power improvement did not show significant differences between the groups.
Primary RTSA using inlay or onlay humerus implants was associated with recovery from pseudoparalysis and good clinical outcomes. However, RTSA with onlay humerus implantation led to clinically superior results in terms of external rotation.
反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)已成为治疗肩袖巨大撕裂合并肩袖撕裂性关节炎的首选方法,许多新型设计被提出以克服经典 RTSA 的缺点。本研究旨在评估和比较使用颈干角为 155°的内侧嵌入式肱骨植入物或颈干角为 145°的外侧嵌入式肱骨植入物治疗肩袖撕裂性关节炎患者的 RTSA 结果。
对 32 例嵌入式植入物和 32 例外侧嵌入式植入物进行回顾性研究。在术前、术后 3、6 和 12 个月以及术后至少 24 个月的最后一次随访时,评估主动活动度(ROM)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、抬高和外旋的运动力量以及功能评分,包括美国肩肘外科医师评分、Constant 评分和韩国肩关节评分系统。评估肩胛骨切迹、外侧肱骨偏移和三角肌包裹偏移的影像学表现。
两组患者术前的人口统计学数据无显著差异(>0.05)。平均随访时间为 24.9 个月。两组患者在最后一次随访时,前屈、功能评分和疼痛 VAS 评分均显著改善。除了在术后 3 个月和 12 个月以及最后一次随访时,外侧嵌入式植入物组的外旋活动度显著更大外,两组在各个时间点的 ROM 或功能评分均无显著差异。两组的肩胛骨切迹发生率和最终力量改善无显著差异。
使用嵌入式或外侧嵌入式肱骨植入物的原发性 RTSA 可恢复假性瘫痪并获得良好的临床结果。然而,外侧嵌入式肱骨植入物的 RTSA 在旋转方面的临床效果更佳。