Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb;15(1):13-19. doi: 10.4055/cios22195. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
Exchange nailing is a standard treatment for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing. However, substantial uncertainty and controversy remain regarding the mode of interlocking fixation. This study aimed to compare the success rate and time to union of exchange nailing based on interlocking modes.
We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent exchange nailing for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion between February 2000 and February 2021. Patients who underwent exchange nailing using the dynamically locked mode and statically locked mode constituted the dynamic group and static group, respectively. We compared the success rates of the index surgery and the time to union between the groups and measured the extent of interlocking screw migration on the dynamic oblong hole in the dynamic group.
The dynamic group and static group comprised 17 patients and 18 patients, respectively. All patients in the dynamic group achieved bone union, whereas 5 patients in the static group did not and underwent additional intervention. The success rate of the index surgery was significantly higher in the dynamic group than in the static group (100% vs. 72.2%, = 0.045). Four of the 5 failed unions in the static group achieved bone union after dynamization. The median time to union was significantly shorter in the dynamic group than in the static group (6.0 months [range, 4.0-6.0] vs. 12.0 months [range, 3.7-21.7], = 0.035). In the dynamic group, 3 of 17 patients exhibited interlocking screw migration ranging from 1.1 to 4.1 mm.
Exchange nailing with dynamic mode yields a higher success rate and shorter time to union in aseptic femoral shaft nonunion than that with static mode, without the risk of excessive shortening.
交锁钉是治疗髓内钉治疗后股骨干骨不连的标准治疗方法。然而,对于交锁固定方式仍存在很大的不确定性和争议。本研究旨在比较基于交锁方式的交锁钉翻修的成功率和愈合时间。
我们回顾性分析了 2000 年 2 月至 2021 年 2 月期间连续因无菌性股骨干骨不连而行交锁钉翻修的所有患者。采用动力锁定模式和静态锁定模式进行交锁钉翻修的患者分别为动力组和静态组。我们比较了两组患者的手术成功率和愈合时间,并测量了动力组动力椭圆形孔中交锁螺钉的迁移程度。
动力组和静态组分别包括 17 例和 18 例患者。动力组所有患者均实现骨愈合,而静态组 5 例患者未愈合,需要进一步干预。动力组的手术成功率明显高于静态组(100%比 72.2%,=0.045)。静态组 5 例失败愈合中有 4 例在动力化后实现骨愈合。动力组的愈合时间明显短于静态组(6.0 个月[范围,4.0-6.0]比 12.0 个月[范围,3.7-21.7],=0.035)。在动力组,17 例患者中有 3 例出现交锁螺钉迁移,范围为 1.1-4.1mm。
与静态模式相比,动力模式下的交锁钉翻修在无菌性股骨干骨不连中具有更高的成功率和更短的愈合时间,且不存在过度缩短的风险。