Suppr超能文献

基于视频的正副作用信息框架的影响:一项在线实验。

Effects of a video-based positive side-effect information framing: An online experiment.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg.

Division of Design, Computer Science and Media, Department of Media Management, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2023 Aug;42(8):593-602. doi: 10.1037/hea0001263. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite the public health value of vaccines, vaccination uptake rates are stagnating. Expected adverse events following immunization are a major source of concern and play a role in the emergence of vaccine hesitancy. Since nocebo mechanisms are involved in the perception of adverse reactions, positive side-effect communication is warranted. The aim of the present study was to compile a comprehensive communication strategy that minimizes expectations of nocebo effects while respecting the informed consent procedure.

METHOD

In a randomized 2 × 2 between-subject design, 652 participants received information about COVID-19 or influenza vaccination using either standard side-effect messaging or messaging enriched with proven elements of expectation-optimizing framing. A physician presented information online via video. Moderation analyses were conducted to examine effects among particular subpopulations. Expected adverse event ratings following an imagined immunization, cost-benefit ratios of the vaccination, and future vaccination intentions were assessed.

RESULTS

Information content ratings were equally high in each group. Positive framing significantly decreased adverse event expectations in the COVID-19 information group and raised the cost-benefit ratio in the influenza condition, indicating higher benefits than cost expectations. Moderation analysis revealed that the framed side-effect communication lowered the expected COVID-19 vaccination uptake willingness in individuals with strong anti-vaccination attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Facing the ongoing coronavirus mass vaccinations, positive information frames have a small but significant impact on vaccination concerns while upholding informed consent. Although intervention trials are still pending, this approach could help decrease vaccine hesitancy by reducing fearful expectations. However, it seems that it should not be used without considering vaccination attitudes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

尽管疫苗具有公共卫生价值,但疫苗接种率却停滞不前。预期的疫苗不良反应是人们关注的主要问题之一,也是疫苗犹豫出现的原因之一。由于存在着非安慰剂效应机制,因此有必要对积极的副作用进行沟通。本研究旨在制定一个全面的沟通策略,在尊重知情同意程序的同时,最大限度地减少对安慰剂效应的预期。

方法

采用随机 2×2 被试间设计,652 名参与者通过标准副作用信息或包含已证实的期望优化框架元素的信息,接受关于 COVID-19 或流感疫苗接种的信息。医生通过视频在线提供信息。进行了调节分析,以检验特定亚组人群中的效果。评估了想象接种后的预期不良事件发生率、疫苗接种的成本效益比以及未来的接种意愿。

结果

每组的信息内容评分都很高。在 COVID-19 信息组中,积极的框架显著降低了不良反应预期,而在流感条件下提高了成本效益比,表明预期的收益高于成本。调节分析表明,在具有强烈反疫苗态度的个体中,框架化的副作用沟通降低了对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的预期意愿。

结论

面对当前的冠状病毒大规模疫苗接种,积极的信息框架在坚持知情同意的同时,对疫苗接种的担忧产生了微小但显著的影响。尽管干预试验仍在进行中,但这种方法通过减少恐惧的预期,可能有助于减少疫苗犹豫。然而,在不考虑接种态度的情况下,似乎不应该使用这种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验