From the School of Medicine.
Departments of Plastic Surgery.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Aug 1;152(2):463-471. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010298. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
Review platforms such as Yelp are increasingly used by patients establishing care and may contain substantial information regarding patient preferences and potential biases. The authors' aims were to (1) analyze patient satisfaction through identifying factors associated with positive and negative patient reviews for plastic surgery providers across the United States, and (2) investigate the association between overall rating and different physician and practice factors based on gender and race.
Reviews of plastic surgery provider practices from cities across seven different regions within the United States were obtained from Yelp. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. Chi-square tests were used to determine whether race or sex was associated with overall rating (of five stars) and qualitative themes.
A total of 5210 reviews met inclusion criteria; 80.3% received a five-star rating and 13.5% received a one-star rating. Positive Yelp reviews and higher ratings were associated with positive comments regarding surgical and injectable outcomes, physical examination, communication, competency/knowledge base, temperament, scheduling, and staff interactions. When the following factors were mentioned negatively, the practice was more likely to receive a lower rating: temperament, communication, cost consciousness, surgical and injectable outcomes, physical examination, billing/insurance, scheduling, interactions with staff, and wait times. No association was identified in terms of overall physician rating based on sex or race; however, there were differences noted in distribution of positive and negative themes.
Patient reviews on Yelp indicate that several physician and practice factors influence patient satisfaction. The themes reported in this study may be used by plastic surgery providers to identify areas for practice improvement to enhance the overall patient experience.
Yelp 等评论平台越来越被患者用来建立医疗服务关系,这些平台上可能包含大量与患者偏好和潜在偏见相关的信息。作者的目的是:(1)通过确定与美国各地整形手术提供者的正面和负面患者评价相关的因素,来分析患者满意度;(2)根据性别和种族,调查整体评分与不同医生和实践因素之间的关系。
从美国七个不同地区的城市获取了 Yelp 上的整形手术提供者实践评论。进行了定量和定性分析。卡方检验用于确定种族或性别是否与整体评分(五分制)和定性主题相关。
共有 5210 条评论符合纳入标准;80.3%的评论获得五星评价,13.5%的评论获得一星评价。积极的 Yelp 评论和更高的评分与手术和注射效果、体检、沟通、能力/知识基础、气质、预约和员工互动的积极评价相关。当以下因素被负面提及时,该实践更有可能获得较低的评分:气质、沟通、成本意识、手术和注射效果、体检、账单/保险、预约、与员工的互动和等待时间。根据性别或种族,整体医生评分没有关联;然而,在积极和消极主题的分布上存在差异。
Yelp 上的患者评价表明,一些医生和实践因素会影响患者满意度。本研究报告的主题可以被整形手术提供者用来确定需要改进的实践领域,以提高整体患者体验。