• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否过度治疗孤立性眶底骨折?

Are We Overoperating on Isolated Orbital Floor Fractures?

机构信息

From the Plastic Surgery Department, Hadassah University Medical Center.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Sep 1;152(3):629-637. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010284. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010284
PMID:36780363
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orbital floor fracture defect size and inferior rectus (IR) rounding index are currently accepted indications for surgery to prevent late enophthalmos. The authors analyzed the positive predictive value (PPV) of these indications.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with orbital floor fractures presenting without enophthalmos underwent Hertel exophthalmometry at presentation and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, 13, 26, and 52 or more after injury. Orbital defect size and IR rounding index were measured from computed tomographic scans, and PPVs of defects of 1.5 to 2 cm 2 or larger and IR rounding index of 1 or higher for enophthalmos (≥2 mm) were calculated.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients had isolated orbital floor fractures (group A), three had noncontinuous orbital floor and medial wall fractures (group B), and six had continuous orbital floor with medial wall fractures (group C). Mean follow-up time was 440 days. Of all patients, 20 had a defect size of 1.5 cm 2 or larger, 12 had a defect of 2.0 cm 2 or larger, and 13 had an IR rounding index of 1 or higher. Of the 28 patients, only one from group A and two from group C developed enophthalmos of 2 mm only. The PPVs of orbital floor defect size of 1.5 cm 2 or larger and 2 cm 2 or larger (groups A and B only) for late enophthalmos were 6.7% and 0%, respectively. The PPV of IR rounding index of 1 or higher for late enophthalmos (all groups) was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with orbital floor fractures presenting without enophthalmos, defects of 1.5 cm 2 or larger and 2 cm 2 or larger, and IR rounding index of 1 or higher, are weakly predictive of late enophthalmos. Furthermore, patients who do not develop enophthalmos within 3 weeks of injury are unlikely to develop significant (>2 mm) late enophthalmos.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

摘要

背景

目前,眶底骨折缺损大小和下直肌(IR)圆钝指数被认为是预防迟发性眼球内陷的手术指征。作者分析了这些指征的阳性预测值(PPV)。

方法

28 例无眼球内陷的眶底骨折患者在受伤时及伤后 1、2、3、6、13、26 周和 52 周或更长时间进行 Hertel 突眼度测量。通过计算机断层扫描测量眶缺损大小和 IR 圆钝指数,并计算缺损面积为 1.5 至 2cm 2 或更大,以及 IR 圆钝指数为 1 或更高的患者发生眼球内陷(≥2mm)的 PPV。

结果

19 例患者为单纯眶底骨折(A 组),3 例为非连续性眶底和内侧壁骨折(B 组),6 例为连续性眶底伴内侧壁骨折(C 组)。平均随访时间为 440 天。所有患者中,20 例眶缺损面积为 1.5cm 2 或更大,12 例为 2.0cm 2 或更大,13 例 IR 圆钝指数为 1 或更高。在 28 例患者中,仅有 1 例 A 组和 2 例 C 组患者出现 2mm 仅有的眼球内陷。A 组和 B 组(仅这两组)眶底缺损面积为 1.5cm 2 或更大和 2cm 2 或更大的患者发生迟发性眼球内陷的 PPV 分别为 6.7%和 0%。所有患者的 IR 圆钝指数为 1 或更高的患者发生迟发性眼球内陷的 PPV 为 0%。

结论

对于无眼球内陷的眶底骨折患者,缺损面积为 1.5cm 2 或更大和 2cm 2 或更大,以及 IR 圆钝指数为 1 或更高,提示有发生迟发性眼球内陷的可能性较低。此外,受伤后 3 周内未发生眼球内陷的患者不太可能发生明显(>2mm)的迟发性眼球内陷。

临床问题/证据水平:风险,III 级。

相似文献

1
Are We Overoperating on Isolated Orbital Floor Fractures?是否过度治疗孤立性眶底骨折?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Sep 1;152(3):629-637. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010284. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Rounding of the inferior rectus muscle as an indication of orbital floor fracture with periorbital disruption.下直肌圆钝作为眶底骨折伴眶周结构破坏的一种表现。
J Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;36(3):175-80.
3
The impact of orbital floor defect ratio on changes in the inferior rectus muscle and prediction of posttraumatic enophthalmos - A cadaver study.眼眶底骨折比例对下直肌变化及外伤性眼球内陷预测的影响——尸体研究。
Ann Anat. 2024 Aug;255:152294. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152294. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
4
Predicting late enophthalmos: Differences between medial and inferior orbital wall fractures.预测晚期眼球内陷:眶内侧壁骨折与眶下壁骨折的差异
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Dec;69(12):e238-e244. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Orbital Index: A Novel Comprehensive Quantitative Tool for Prediction of Delayed Enophthalmos in Orbital Floor Fracture Management.眼眶指数:一种预测眼眶骨折治疗后迟发性眼球内陷的新型综合定量工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Sep 1;150(3):625e-629e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009428. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Association of fracture type with enophthalmos and intraorbital volume correction in orbital fractures: A computed tomographic study.眼眶骨折中骨折类型与眼球内陷及眶内容积矫正的相关性:一项计算机断层扫描研究
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 1;73(2):238-243. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2803_23. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
7
Rounding of the inferior rectus muscle as a predictor of enophthalmos in orbital floor fractures.下直肌圆钝作为眶底骨折眼球内陷的预测指标
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Jan;18(1):127-32. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31802ccdc8.
8
Combined transcutaneous transethmoidal/transorbital approach for the treatment of medial orbital blowout fractures.经皮经筛窦/经眶联合入路治疗眶内侧壁爆裂骨折
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 May;117(6):1947-55. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000218330.55731.2d.
9
Correlation between changes of medial rectus muscle section and enophthalmos in patients with medial orbital wall fracture.内侧眶壁骨折患者内直肌截面积变化与眼球内陷的相关性。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Nov;62(11):1379-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.042. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
10
The influence of concomitant medial wall fracture on the results of orbital floor reconstruction.伴随内侧壁骨折对眶底重建结果的影响。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;46(4):573-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Isolated Orbital Fracture - Treatment and Outcomes in a Single Tertiary Care Centre.孤立性眼眶骨折——单一三级医疗中心的治疗与结果
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Dec;17(4):NP163-NP171. doi: 10.1177/19433875241247370. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Assessing the accuracy of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of orbital fractures: Is this the future of surgical decision-making?评估人工智能在眼眶骨折诊断和治疗中的准确性:这会是外科手术决策的未来吗?
JPRAS Open. 2024 Sep 30;42:275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.09.014. eCollection 2024 Dec.