• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TUXEDO-2 印度研究的原理和设计:Ultra-Thin strUt Supraflex Cruz 与 XiencE 在伴有多支血管病变的糖尿病患者中的比较-2.

Rationale and design of the TUXEDO-2 India study: Ultra-Thin strUt Supraflex Cruz versus XiencE in a Diabetic pOpulation with multi-vessel disease-2.

机构信息

Batra Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Batra Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Delhi, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2023 Feb;256:128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.082. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.082
PMID:36780372
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease has been questioned by the results of the FREEDOM trial, which showed superiority of coronary artery bypass graft(CABG) over first generation drug-eluting stents (DES) including a reduction in mortality. In the light of safer and more efficacious stents and significantly better medical management, those results that date back to 2012 need to be revisited. TUXEDO-2 is a study designed to compare two contemporary stents in Indian diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease.

AIMS

The primary objective of the TUXEDO-2 study is to compare the clinical outcomes of PCI with ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz vs Xience when combined with contemporary optimal medical therapy (OMT) in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. The secondary objective is to compare clinical outcomes between a pooled cohort from both arms of the study (Supraflex Cruz + Xience; PCI arm) vs CABG based on a performance goal derived from the CABG arm of the FREEDOM trial (historical cohort). The tertiary objective is a randomized comparison of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin for the composite of ischemic and bleeding events.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, multi-centre, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, controlled study, 1,800 patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease (inclusion criteria similar to FREEDOM trial) with indication for coronary revascularization will be randomly assigned to Supraflex Cruz or Xience stents and also to ticagrelor- or prasugrel- based antiplatelet strategies. All patients will receive guideline directed OMT and optimal PCI including image- and physiology-guided complete revascularization where feasible. The patients will be followed through five years to assess their clinical status and major clinical events. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of target lesion failure at one-year for Supraflex Cruz vs Xience (primary objective) with an expected event rate of 11% and a non-inferiority margin of 4.5%. For PCI vs CABG (secondary objective), the primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at one-year and yearly up to five years, with a performance goal of 21.6%. For ticagrelor vs prasugrel (tertiary objective), the primary endpoint is composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding as per the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) at one-year with expected event rate of 15% and a non-inferiority margin of 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The TUXEDO-2 study is a contemporary study involving state-of-the-art PCI combined with guideline directed OMT in a complex subset of patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease. The trial will answer the question as to whether a biodegradable polymer coated ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz stent is an attractive option for PCI in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. It will also help address the question whether the results of FREEDOM trial would have been different in the current era of safer and more efficacious stents and modern medical therapy. In addition, the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin will be evaluated. (CTRI/2019/11/022088).

摘要

背景

FREEDOM 试验的结果对糖尿病合并多血管病变患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的作用提出了质疑,该试验表明第一代药物洗脱支架(DES)包括死亡率降低在内的优势优于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。鉴于更安全和更有效的支架以及明显更好的医疗管理,这些可以追溯到 2012 年的结果需要重新评估。TUXEDO-2 是一项旨在比较印度多血管病变糖尿病患者使用两种当代支架的研究。

目的

TUXEDO-2 研究的主要目的是比较在多血管病变的糖尿病患者中,使用超薄 Supraflex Cruz 支架与 Xience 支架联合当代最佳药物治疗(OMT)进行 PCI 的临床结果。次要目的是比较研究的两个治疗组(Supraflex Cruz + Xience;PCI 组)的临床结果与基于 FREEDOM 试验 CABG 组的衍生目标(历史队列)的 CABG 之间的临床结果。次要目的是比较替格瑞洛与普拉格雷加阿司匹林用于缺血和出血事件的复合终点。

方法

在这项前瞻性、开放标签、多中心、2×2 析因、随机、对照研究中,将 1800 例有糖尿病和多血管病变(与 FREEDOM 试验相似的纳入标准)并需要冠状动脉血运重建的患者随机分配至 Supraflex Cruz 或 Xience 支架,并接受替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的抗血小板治疗策略。所有患者将接受指南指导的 OMT 和最佳 PCI,包括可行时进行图像和生理学指导的完全血运重建。患者将随访 5 年,以评估其临床状况和主要临床事件。主要终点是在一年时比较 Supraflex Cruz 与 Xience 的靶病变失败率(一级目标),预期事件发生率为 11%,非劣效性边界为 4.5%。对于 PCI 与 CABG(二级目标),主要终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE),定义为一年时所有原因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或卒中和 5 年时每年的复合终点,预期事件发生率为 21.6%。对于替格瑞洛与普拉格雷(三级目标),主要终点是根据出血学术研究联合会(BARC)定义的一年时的死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和大出血复合终点,预期事件发生率为 15%,非劣效性边界为 5%。

结论

TUXEDO-2 研究是一项涉及最先进的 PCI 联合指南指导的 OMT 的当代研究,涉及一组复杂的糖尿病合并多血管病变患者。该试验将回答以下问题:在当前更安全、更有效的支架和现代药物治疗时代,生物可降解聚合物涂层的超薄 Supraflex Cruz 支架是否是多血管病变糖尿病患者 PCI 的一个有吸引力的选择。它还将有助于解决 FREEDOM 试验的结果在当前更安全和更有效的支架和现代药物治疗时代是否会有所不同的问题。此外,还将评估替格瑞洛与普拉格雷加阿司匹林相比的疗效和安全性。(CTRI/2019/11/022088)。

相似文献

1
Rationale and design of the TUXEDO-2 India study: Ultra-Thin strUt Supraflex Cruz versus XiencE in a Diabetic pOpulation with multi-vessel disease-2.TUXEDO-2 印度研究的原理和设计:Ultra-Thin strUt Supraflex Cruz 与 XiencE 在伴有多支血管病变的糖尿病患者中的比较-2.
Am Heart J. 2023 Feb;256:128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.082. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
A randomised controlled trial of the sirolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer ultra-thin Supraflex stent versus the everolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer SYNERGY stent for three-vessel coronary artery disease: rationale and design of the Multivessel TALENT trial.随机对照试验研究西罗莫司洗脱可生物降解聚合物超亲水性 Supraflex 支架与依维莫司洗脱可生物降解聚合物 SYNERGY 支架治疗三血管病变冠状动脉疾病的疗效:多血管 TALENT 试验的原理和设计。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Dec 18;16(12):e997-e1004. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00772.
3
Comparison of Ultrathin- Versus Thin-Strut Stents in Patients With High Bleeding Risk PCI: Results From the COMPARE 60/80 HBR Trial: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.高出血风险 PCI 患者中使用超薄-与薄壁支架的比较:来自 COMPARE 60/80 HBR 试验的结果:一项开放标签、随机、对照试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;17(10):e014042. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.014042. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
Safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with ultra-thin strut for treatment of atherosclerotic lesions (TALENT): a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial.载有西罗莫司的超小厚度冠状动脉支架治疗动脉粥样硬化性病变的安全性和有效性(TALENT):一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):987-997. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32467-X. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
5
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
6
Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases--comparison of REDUCtion of prasugrEl dose or POLYmer TECHnology in ACS patients (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS RCT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.优化冠状动脉疾病治疗策略——急性冠状动脉综合征患者中普拉格雷剂量降低或聚合物技术比较(HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS随机对照试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Sep 15;16:409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0925-5.
7
A prospective multicentre randomised all-comers trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of the thin-strut sirolimus-eluting coronary stent SUPRAFLEX: rationale and design of the Thin Strut Sirolimus-eluting Stent in All Comers Population vs Everolimus-eluting Stent (TALENT) trial.一项评估薄壁西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架 SUPRAFLEX 安全性和有效性的前瞻性多中心、随机、所有患者入组试验:薄壁西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架在所有患者人群中的疗效比较(TALENT)试验的原理和设计。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Jul 20;15(4):e362-e369. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00499.
8
A clinical and angiographic study of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: the EXECUTIVE trial (EXecutive RCT: evaluating XIENCE V in a multi vessel disease).XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者的临床和血管造影研究:EXECUTIVE 试验(EXecutive RCT:评估 XIENCE V 在多支血管疾病中的应用)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1012-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Safety and efficacy of the latest generation biodegradable polymer-coated ultrathin sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease in a European all-comer population with or without high bleeding risk: The Cruz HBR Registry.最新一代可生物降解聚合物涂层超薄西罗莫司洗脱支架在有或无高出血风险的欧洲所有患者人群中治疗冠状动脉疾病的安全性和疗效:Cruz HBR 注册研究。
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2024 Aug;72(4):355-365. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06462-7. Epub 2024 May 27.
10
Sirolimus-eluting stents with ultrathin struts versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: final three-year results of the TALENT trial.载有西罗莫司的超亲水性药物洗脱支架与载有依维莫司的药物洗脱支架治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较:TALENT 试验三年最终结果。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Aug 19;18(6):492-502. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00766.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrathin-strut stents - towards zero stent-related events?超薄支架——能否实现零支架相关事件?
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Jul 30;11(2):e97-e98. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-E-25-00004. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Current status of percutaneous coronary interventions in diabetics with multivessel disease - is it time to challenge FREEDOM?多支血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的现状——是时候挑战FREEDOM研究了吗?
AsiaIntervention. 2024 Jul 26;10(2):102-109. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00016. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
10 Years of SYNTAX: Closing an Era of Clinical Research After Identifying New Outcome Determinants.
SYNTAX研究十年:在确定新的预后决定因素后,结束一个临床研究时代。
JACC Asia. 2023 May 30;3(3):409-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.014. eCollection 2023 Jun.