Department of Ecophysiology, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
J Plant Physiol. 2023 Mar;282:153921. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.153921. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
Anatomical, histochemical, chemical, and biosynthetic similarities and differences of cutinized and suberized plant cell walls are presented and reviewed in brief. Based on this, the functional properties of cutinized and suberized plant cell walls acting as transport barriers are compared and discussed in more detail. This is of general importance because fundamental misconceptions about relationships in plant-environment water relations are commonly encountered in the scientific literature. It will be shown here, that cuticles represent highly efficient apoplastic transport barriers significantly reducing the diffusion of water and dissolved compounds. The transport barrier of cuticles is mainly established by the deposition of cuticular waxes. Upon wax extraction, with the cutin polymer remaining, cuticular permeability for water and dissolved non-ionized and lipophilic solutes are increasing by 2-3 orders of magnitude, whereas polar and charged substances (e.g., nutrient ions) are only weakly affected (2- to 3-fold increases in permeability). Suberized apoplastic barriers without the deposition of wax are at least as permeable as the cutin polymer matrix without waxes and hardly offer any resistance to the free movement of water. Only upon the deposition of significant amounts of wax, as it is the case with suberized periderms exposed to the atmosphere, an efficient transport barrier for water can be established by suberized cell walls. Comparing the driving forces (gradients between water potentials inside leaves and roots and the surrounding environment) for water loss acting on leaves and roots, it is shown that leaves must have a genetically pre-defined highly efficient transpiration barrier fairly independent from rapidly changing environmental influences. Roots, in most conditions facing a soil environment with relative humidities very close to 100%, are orders of magnitude more permeable to water than leaf cuticles. Upon desiccation, the permanent wilting point of plants is defined as -1.5 MPa, which still corresponds to nearly 99% relative humidity in soil. Thus, the main reason for plant water stress leading to dehydration is the inability of root tissues to decrease their internal water potential to values more negative than -1.5 MPa and not the lack of a transport barrier for water in roots and leaves. Taken together, the commonly mentioned concepts that a drought-induced increase of cuticular wax or root suberin considerably strengthens the apoplastic leaf or root transport barriers and thus aids in water conservation appears highly questionable.
简要介绍并综述了角质化和木质化植物细胞壁在解剖学、组织化学、化学和生物合成方面的相似性和差异。在此基础上,更详细地比较和讨论了角质化和木质化植物细胞壁作为运输屏障的功能特性。这一点非常重要,因为在科学文献中,人们普遍对植物与环境水分关系中的基本误解。本文将表明,角质层代表着高效的质外体运输屏障,可显著降低水和溶解化合物的扩散。角质层的运输屏障主要是通过沉积角质层蜡来建立的。在提取蜡质后,当角质聚合物仍然存在时,角质层对水和非离子化及亲脂性溶质的渗透性会增加 2-3 个数量级,而极性和带电物质(例如营养离子)的渗透性仅略有增加(渗透性增加 2-3 倍)。没有沉积蜡的木质化质外体屏障与没有蜡的角质聚合物基质一样具有渗透性,几乎不会对水的自由运动产生任何阻力。只有当沉积了大量的蜡质,就像暴露在大气中的木质化周皮一样,木质化细胞壁才能为水建立有效的运输屏障。比较作用于叶片和根系的水分损失的驱动力(叶片内部和根部水势与周围环境之间的梯度),表明叶片必须具有预先确定的高度高效的蒸腾屏障,该屏障相对环境的快速变化具有一定的独立性。在大多数情况下,根系面临的土壤环境相对湿度接近 100%,其水渗透性比叶片角质层高几个数量级。在干燥时,植物的永久萎蔫点定义为-1.5 MPa,这仍然对应于土壤中近 99%的相对湿度。因此,导致植物水分胁迫和脱水的主要原因不是根系缺乏水的运输屏障,而是根系组织无法将其内部水势降低到低于-1.5 MPa 的负值。综上所述,通常提到的概念,即干旱诱导的角质层蜡或根木质素的增加会大大增强质外体叶片或根的运输屏障,从而有助于节水,这一点似乎非常值得怀疑。