• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[结直肠腺瘤的随访护理]

[Follow-up care in colorectal adenoma].

作者信息

Dauer U, Haas I, Stock W

机构信息

Chirurgische Abteilung des Marien-Hospitals, Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1987 Nov 27;112(48):1860-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1068343.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1068343
PMID:3678093
Abstract

From 1980 to 1985, 319 adenomatous colorectal polyps were removed in 297 patients. All patients were entered into a computerized follow-up programme with yearly follow-up. The recommended follow-up was rejected by 58 patients (22.1%). 93 new adenomatous polyps were found in the course of the follow-up in 53 patients (35.8%), five of them histologically invasive carcinomas. The proportion of carcinomas was lowered from 10.6% at first examination to 5.4% in the follow-up period. Size of polyp correlated significantly with carcinomatous change. Size of the adenomas removed at follow-up was markedly smaller than that removed at first examination (69.4% smaller than 1 cm compared with 44.2% at follow-up). In six patients with early invasive carcinoma, further resections were undertaken, while in six others only the polyps were removed. But local recurrences occurred in both groups. Regular follow-up after polypectomy of colorectal adenoma is thus essential.

摘要

1980年至1985年期间,297例患者切除了319枚结直肠腺瘤性息肉。所有患者均进入计算机化随访程序,每年进行随访。58例患者(22.1%)拒绝了推荐的随访。随访期间,53例患者(35.8%)发现93枚新的腺瘤性息肉,其中5例为组织学浸润性癌。癌的比例从首次检查时的10.6%降至随访期间的5.4%。息肉大小与癌变显著相关。随访时切除的腺瘤大小明显小于首次检查时切除的腺瘤(小于1 cm的腺瘤,首次检查时为44.2%,随访时为69.4%)。6例早期浸润癌患者进行了进一步切除,另外6例仅切除了息肉。但两组均出现局部复发。因此,结直肠腺瘤切除术后定期随访至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Follow-up care in colorectal adenoma].[结直肠腺瘤的随访护理]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1987 Nov 27;112(48):1860-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1068343.
2
Evaluation of the risk for metachronous colorectal neoplasms following intestinal polypectomy: a clinical, endoscopic and pathological study.肠息肉切除术后异时性结直肠肿瘤风险评估:一项临床、内镜及病理研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Sep-Oct;45(23):1565-72.
3
Follow-up colonoscopy in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps.大肠腺瘤性息肉患者的随访结肠镜检查
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;279:79-87.
4
[Results of regular follow-up after removal of colorectal adenomas].
Med Klin (Munich). 1993 Aug 15;88(8):471-7.
5
Endoscopic follow-up of 383 patients with colorectal adenoma: an observational study in daily practice.383例大肠腺瘤患者的内镜随访:一项日常实践中的观察性研究
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006 Jun;15(3):202-10. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000195710.56825.b1.
6
High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up.在临床试验之外,息肉切除术后随访结肠镜检查也可实现高依从率:随访低依从性不会降低息肉切除术的疗效。
Colorectal Dis. 2004 May;6(3):158-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00585.x.
7
[Endoscopic Therapy of Early Colorectal Cancer (pT1) - A Prospective Study].[早期结直肠癌(pT1)的内镜治疗——一项前瞻性研究]
Z Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug;41(8):703-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41213.
8
The polyp prevention trial I: rationale, design, recruitment, and baseline participant characteristics.息肉预防试验I:原理、设计、招募及参与者基线特征
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 May;5(5):375-83.
9
Argon plasma coagulation after piecemeal polypectomy of sessile colorectal adenomas: long-term follow-up study.广基结直肠癌腺瘤分块切除术后氩离子凝固术:长期随访研究
Endoscopy. 2003 Mar;35(3):212-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37254.
10
Prevalence, histology, endoscopic treatment and long-term follow-up of large colonic polyps and laterally spreading tumors. The Romanian experience.大肠大息肉及侧向发育型肿瘤的患病率、组织学、内镜治疗及长期随访:罗马尼亚的经验
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008 Dec;17(4):419-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Follow-up after polypectomy of colorectal adenomas. The importance of total colonoscopy.大肠腺瘤息肉切除术后的随访。全结肠镜检查的重要性。
Surg Endosc. 1989;3(2):87-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00590907.