Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Soc Stud Sci. 2023 Dec;53(6):938-953. doi: 10.1177/03063127231151237. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
This article problematizes vision in practices of identification. It draws on the metaphor of the 'interface' to emphasize that vision emerges 'in between' eyes, faces, bodies, objects and ideas of belonging and otherness. As such, vision can be a material and political technology that enacts certain people as racial others. To attend to the materiality and politics of vision and its messy relationship with race, I bring together three European stories in which faces are drawn, seen or identified, while race hides or surfaces in intriguing ways. Through these stories we learn that race is saturated with affect and is recalled in objects and bodies. In addition, this article offers a novel methodological approach. It employs the eyes of the reader not only to read but also to watch. Vision itself becomes a technology, this time not to produce or reinforce, but to disturb and perhaps even undo ideas of racial otherness. Through the use of experimental montage, I attend to the complexities and incongruities of seeing faces and race without settling on a single narrative. I actively engage the eyes of the viewer to argue that vision is always relational and partial and therefore, it can also be harnessed to undo racial otherness by fragmenting, multiplying and affecting.
本文探讨了认同实践中的视觉问题。它借鉴了“界面”的隐喻,强调视觉是在眼睛、面孔、身体、物体以及归属感和他者性的观念之间“产生”的。因此,视觉可以成为一种将某些人构成为种族他者的物质和政治技术。为了关注视觉的物质性和政治性及其与种族的复杂关系,我将三个欧洲故事汇集在一起,这些故事中描绘、看到或识别了面孔,而种族则以有趣的方式隐藏或浮现。通过这些故事,我们了解到种族充满了情感,并且在物体和身体中被唤起。此外,本文还提出了一种新颖的方法论方法。它不仅使用读者的眼睛阅读,而且还用于观察。视觉本身成为一种技术,这次不是用于产生或强化,而是用于干扰,甚至可能消除种族他者性的观念。通过使用实验蒙太奇,我关注看到面孔和种族的复杂性和不协调性,而不局限于单一的叙述。我积极调动观众的眼睛,认为视觉始终是关系性和局部性的,因此,它也可以通过碎片化、倍增和影响来利用,以消除种族他者性。