Suppr超能文献

高阿司匹林治疗血小板反应性与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再狭窄:冠状动脉内支架置入和抗栓治疗方案-阿司匹林和血小板抑制(ISAR-ASPI)登记研究结果。

High on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) Registry.

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Cardiology and Technische Universität München, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.

DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1231-1239. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02161-z. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association between high on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity (HAPR) and the subsequent risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with predominantly drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND

The association between HAPR and subsequent risk of restenosis after PCI is unclear.

METHODS

This study included 4839 patients undergoing PCI (02/2007-12/2011) in the setting of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) registry. Platelet function was assessed with impedance aggregometry using the multi-plate analyzer immediately before PCI and after intravenous administration of aspirin (500 mg). The primary outcome was clinical restenosis, defined as target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.

RESULTS

The upper quintile cut-off of platelet reactivity measurements (191 AU × min) was used to categorize patients into a group with HAPR (platelet reactivity > 191 AU × min; n = 952) and a group without HAPR (platelet reactivity ≤ 191 AU × min; n = 3887). The primary outcome occurred in 94 patients in the HAPR group and 405 patients without HAPR (cumulative incidence, 9.9% and 10.4%; HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.77-1.19; P = 0.70). Follow-up angiography was performed in 73.2% of patients. There was no difference in binary restenosis (15.2% vs. 14.9%; P = 0.79) or late lumen loss (0.32 ± 0.57 vs. 0.32 ± 0.59 mm; P = 0.93) between patients with HAPR versus those without HAPR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find an association between HAPR, measured at the time of PCI, and clinical restenosis at 1 year after PCI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估高阿司匹林治疗血小板反应性(HAPR)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后再狭窄的风险之间的关联,所涉及的 PCI 术主要使用药物洗脱支架。

背景

HAPR 与 PCI 后再狭窄风险之间的关联尚不清楚。

方法

本研究纳入了 4839 例于 2007 年 2 月至 2011 年 12 月在冠状动脉支架置入术和抗血栓治疗方案-阿司匹林和血小板抑制(ISAR-ASPI)注册研究中接受 PCI 的患者。在 PCI 术前和静脉注射阿司匹林(500mg)后,使用阻抗聚集仪通过多板分析仪评估血小板功能。主要终点为 1 年时的临床再狭窄,定义为靶病变血运重建。次要终点包括二元血管造影再狭窄和 6 至 8 个月血管造影时的晚期管腔丢失。

结果

使用血小板反应性测量的上五分位数截断值(191 AU×min)将患者分为 HAPR 组(血小板反应性>191 AU×min;n=952)和无 HAPR 组(血小板反应性≤191 AU×min;n=3887)。HAPR 组中有 94 例患者发生主要终点事件,无 HAPR 组中有 405 例患者发生主要终点事件(累积发生率分别为 9.9%和 10.4%;HR=0.96,95%CI 0.77-1.19;P=0.70)。在 73.2%的患者中进行了随访血管造影。HAPR 组和无 HAPR 组的二元再狭窄率(15.2% vs. 14.9%;P=0.79)或晚期管腔丢失(0.32±0.57 vs. 0.32±0.59mm;P=0.93)无差异。

结论

本研究未发现 PCI 时测量的 HAPR 与 PCI 后 1 年的临床再狭窄之间存在关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c4/10449652/5ef8d447cdfe/392_2023_2161_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验