Mutschlechner David, Tscharre Maximilian, Wittmann Franziska, Kitzmantl Daniela, Schlöglhofer Thomas, Wadowski Patricia Pia, Laufer Günther, Eichelberger Beate, Lee Silvia, Wiedemann Dominik, Panzer Simon, Zimpfer Daniel, Gremmel Thomas
Department of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria.
Institute of Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy and Interventional Cardiology, Karl Landsteiner Society, St. Pölten, Austria.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Sep 5;8(6):102564. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102564. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are treated with a potent antithrombotic regimen to prevent pump thrombosis and thromboembolism. High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with ischemic outcomes in cardiovascular disease.
In the current study, we investigated the prevalence and clinical impact of HRPR in stable LVAD patients.
Pump thrombosis, bleeding events, and death were assessed in 62 LVAD patients (19 HeartWare HVAD [Medtronic] and 43 HeartMate 3 [Abbott]) during a 2-year follow-up. Platelet aggregation was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry, and HRPR was defined as arachidonic acid (AA)-inducible platelet aggregation of ≥21 aggregation units. Soluble P-selectin was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Three patients (4.8%) had pump thrombosis and 10 patients (16.1%) suffered a bleeding complication. AA-inducible platelet aggregation was significantly higher in patients with pump thrombosis ( = .01), whereas platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) was comparable between patients without and those with pump thrombosis (both > .05). Platelet aggregation in response to AA, ADP, and TRAP was similar in patients without and with a bleeding event (all > .05). HRPR was detected in 29 patients (46.8%) and was associated with significantly higher platelet aggregation in response to AA, ADP, and TRAP as well as higher levels of soluble P-selectin compared with patients without HRPR (all < .05). All pump thromboses occurred in patients with HRPR (3 vs 0; = .06) and HVAD.
Platelet reactivity is associated with pump thrombosis in LVAD patients. HRPR may represent a risk marker for pump thrombosis, particularly in HVAD patients.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者接受强效抗血栓治疗方案以预防泵血栓形成和血栓栓塞。高治疗期残余血小板反应性(HRPR)与心血管疾病的缺血性结局相关。
在本研究中,我们调查了稳定LVAD患者中HRPR的患病率及其临床影响。
在一项为期2年的随访中,对62例LVAD患者(19例HeartWare HVAD [美敦力公司]和43例HeartMate 3 [雅培公司])的泵血栓形成、出血事件和死亡情况进行了评估。通过多电极聚集测定法测量血小板聚集,HRPR定义为花生四烯酸(AA)诱导的血小板聚集≥21个聚集单位。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法测定可溶性P-选择素。
3例患者(4.8%)发生泵血栓形成,10例患者(16.1%)出现出血并发症。发生泵血栓形成的患者中,AA诱导的血小板聚集显著更高(P = 0.01),而在未发生和发生泵血栓形成的患者中,对二磷酸腺苷(ADP)和凝血酶受体激活肽(TRAP)的血小板聚集情况相当(均P > 0.05)。在未发生和发生出血事件的患者中,对AA、ADP和TRAP的血小板聚集情况相似(均P > 0.05)。29例患者(46.8%)检测到HRPR,与无HRPR的患者相比,其对AA、ADP和TRAP的血小板聚集显著更高,可溶性P-选择素水平也更高(均P < 0.05)。所有泵血栓形成均发生在有HRPR的患者中(3例对0例;P = 0.06)以及使用HVAD的患者中。
血小板反应性与LVAD患者的泵血栓形成相关。HRPR可能是泵血栓形成的风险标志物,尤其是在使用HVAD的患者中。