• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介绍卫生科学指导库 (LIGHTS):一个用于方法指导的活数据库。

Introducing the Library of Guidance for Health Scientists (LIGHTS): A Living Database for Methods Guidance.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

International Graduate Academy, Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2253198. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53198.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53198
PMID:36787138
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Improving methodological quality is a priority in the health research community. Finding appropriate methods guidance can be challenging due to heterogeneous terminology, poor indexing in medical databases, and variation in formats. The Library of Guidance for Health Scientists (LIGHTS) is a new searchable database for methods guidance articles.

OBSERVATIONS

Journal articles that aim to provide guidance for performing (including planning, design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation), reporting, and assessing the quality of health-related research involving humans or human populations (ie, excluding basic and animal research) are eligible for LIGHTS. A team of health researchers, information specialists, and methodologists continuously identifies and manually indexes eligible guidance documents. The search strategy includes focused searches of specific journals, specialized databases, and suggestions from researchers. A current limitation is that a keyword-based search of MEDLINE (and other general databases) and manual screening of records were not feasible because of the large number of hits (n = 915 523). As of September 20, 2022, LIGHTS included 1246 articles (336 reporting guidelines, 80 quality assessment tools, and 830 other methods guidance articles). The LIGHTS website provides a user-oriented search interface including filters for study type, specific methodological topic, research context, guidance type, and development process of the guidance. Automated matching of alternative methodological expressions (eg, enter loss to follow-up and find articles indexed with missing data) enhances search queries.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

LIGHTS is a peer-supported initiative that is intended to increase access to and use of methods guidance relevant to health researchers, statisticians, methods consultants, methods developers, ethics boards, peer reviewers, journal editors, and funding bodies.

摘要

重要性

提高方法学质量是健康研究界的当务之急。由于术语的异质性、医学数据库中的索引不良以及格式的变化,寻找合适的方法指南可能具有挑战性。健康科学家指南库(LIGHTS)是一个新的可搜索数据库,用于方法指南文章。

观察结果

旨在为涉及人类或人群的健康相关研究(即不包括基础和动物研究)的执行(包括规划、设计、进行、分析和解释)、报告和评估质量提供指导的期刊文章有资格获得 LIGHTS。一组健康研究人员、信息专家和方法学家不断识别和手动索引合格的指导文件。搜索策略包括对特定期刊、专门数据库的集中搜索以及研究人员的建议。目前的限制是,由于命中数量过多(n = 915 523),基于关键字的 MEDLINE(和其他一般数据库)搜索和记录的手动筛选不可行。截至 2022 年 9 月 20 日,LIGHTS 包括 1246 篇文章(336 篇报告指南、80 种质量评估工具和 830 种其他方法指南文章)。LIGHTS 网站提供了一个面向用户的搜索界面,包括用于研究类型、特定方法主题、研究背景、指导类型和指导开发过程的过滤器。替代方法表达式的自动匹配(例如,输入失访并找到索引缺失数据的文章)增强了搜索查询。

结论和相关性

LIGHTS 是一项由同行支持的倡议,旨在增加健康研究人员、统计学家、方法顾问、方法开发人员、伦理委员会、同行评审员、期刊编辑和资助机构获取和使用与方法相关的指导的机会。

相似文献

1
Introducing the Library of Guidance for Health Scientists (LIGHTS): A Living Database for Methods Guidance.介绍卫生科学指导库 (LIGHTS):一个用于方法指导的活数据库。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2253198. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53198.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.在MEDLINE和EMBASE中识别诊断准确性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
5
Selective dissemination and indexing of scientific information.科学信息的选择性传播与索引编制
Science. 1971 Jul 23;173(3994):300-8. doi: 10.1126/science.173.3994.300.
6
Conscious sedation guidance.清醒镇静指南。
Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(4):90-1. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400441.
7
[Database indexing of health science journals from the German-speaking area: A journal analysis].[德语区健康科学期刊的数据库索引:期刊分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Apr;150-152:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Assignment of adverse event indexing terms in randomized clinical trials involving spinal manipulative therapy: an audit of records in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.涉及脊柱推拿治疗的随机临床试验中不良事件索引词的分配:对MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库记录的审核
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0320-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological review to develop a list of bias items for adaptive clinical trials: Protocol and rationale.制定适应性临床试验偏倚项目清单的方法学综述:方案与原理
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 12;19(12):e0303315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303315. eCollection 2024.