National Centre for Tropical Medicine, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.
Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Infectious Diseases, CIBERINFEC, Madrid, Spain.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;23(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14938-4.
Due to the mobility of the population in recent years and the spread of Chagas disease (CD) to non-endemic regions, early diagnosis and treatment of CD has become increasingly relevant in non-endemic countries. In order for screening to be effective, health system accessibility must be taken into consideration. This study uses Tanahashi's Health Service Coverage model to gain a deeper understanding of the main diagnostic pathways for Chagas disease in a non-endemic country and the barriers and bottlenecks present in each pathway.
This study used a qualitative design with a phenomenological approach. Twenty-one interviews, two focus group sessions, and two triangular group sessions were conducted between 2015 and 2018 with 37 Bolivian men and women diagnosed with CD in Madrid, Spain. A topic guide was designed to ensure that the interviewers obtained the data concerning knowledge of CD (transmission, symptoms, and treatment), attitudes towards CD, and health behaviour (practices in relation to CD). All interviews, focus groups and triangular groups were recorded and transcribed. A thematic, inductive analysis based on Grounded Theory was performed by two researchers.
Three main pathways to CD diagnosis were identified: 1) pregnancy or blood/organ donation, with no bottlenecks in effective coverage; 2) an individual actively seeking CD testing, with bottlenecks relating to administrative, physical, and time-related accessibility, and effectiveness based on the healthcare professional's knowledge of CD; 3) an individual not actively seeking CD testing, who expresses psychological discomfort or embarrassment about visiting a physician, with a low perception of risk, afraid of stigma, and testing positive, and with little confidence in physicians' knowledge of CD.
Existing bottlenecks in the three main diagnostic pathways for CD are less prevalent during pregnancy and blood donation, but are more prevalent in individuals who do not voluntarily seek serological testing for CD. Future screening protocols will need to take these bottlenecks into consideration to achieve effective coverage.
近年来人口流动以及恰加斯病(CD)传播到非流行地区,使得在非流行国家对 CD 进行早期诊断和治疗变得越来越重要。为了使筛查有效,必须考虑卫生系统的可及性。本研究使用 Tanahashi 的卫生服务覆盖模型,深入了解非流行国家 CD 的主要诊断途径以及每个途径中存在的障碍和瓶颈。
本研究采用定性设计和现象学方法。2015 年至 2018 年期间,在西班牙马德里对 37 名被诊断患有 CD 的玻利维亚男女进行了 21 次访谈、2 次焦点小组会议和 2 次三角小组会议。设计了一个主题指南,以确保访谈者获得有关 CD 知识(传播、症状和治疗)、对 CD 的态度以及健康行为(与 CD 相关的实践)的数据。所有访谈、焦点小组和三角小组都进行了录音和转录。两名研究人员根据扎根理论进行了主题、归纳分析。
确定了 CD 诊断的三条主要途径:1)妊娠或血液/器官捐献,有效覆盖没有瓶颈;2)个体主动寻求 CD 检测,瓶颈与行政、物理和时间相关的可及性以及医疗保健专业人员对 CD 的知识相关的有效性有关;3)个体不主动寻求 CD 检测,对看医生表示心理不适或尴尬,对风险的认识较低,害怕污名化,检测呈阳性,对医生对 CD 的知识缺乏信心。
在妊娠和献血期间,CD 的三条主要诊断途径中的现有瓶颈不太普遍,但在不自愿进行 CD 血清学检测的个体中更为普遍。未来的筛查方案将需要考虑这些瓶颈,以实现有效覆盖。