University Breast Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Aug;42(8):1729-1736. doi: 10.1002/jum.16192. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
We evaluated whether lesion-to-fat ratio measured by shear wave elastography in patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 or 4 lesions has the potential to further refine the assessment of B-mode ultrasound alone in breast cancer diagnostics.
This was a secondary analysis of an international diagnostic multicenter trial (NCT02638935). Data from 1288 women with breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 3 and 4a-c by conventional B-mode ultrasound were analyzed, whereby the focus was placed on differentiating lesions categorized as BI-RADS 3 and BI-RADS 4a. All women underwent shear wave elastography and histopathologic evaluation functioning as reference standard. Reduction of benign biopsies as well as the number of missed malignancies after reclassification using lesion-to-fat ratio measured by shear wave elastography were evaluated.
Breast cancer was diagnosed in 368 (28.6%) of 1288 lesions. The assessment with conventional B-mode ultrasound resulted in 53.8% (495 of 1288) pathologically benign lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4 and therefore false positives as well as in 1.39% (6 of 431) undetected malignancies categorized as BI-RADS 3. Additional lesion-to-fat ratio in BI-RADS 4a lesions with a cutoff value of 1.85 resulted in 30.11% biopsies of benign lesions which correspond to a reduction of 44.04% of false positives.
Adding lesion-to-fat ratio measured by shear wave elastography to conventional B-mode ultrasound in BI-RADS 4a breast lesions could help reduce the number of benign biopsies by 44.04%. At the same time, however, 1.98% of malignancies were missed, which would still be in line with American College of Radiology BI-RADS 3 definition of <2% of undetected malignancies.
我们评估了在乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3 或 4 类病变患者中,通过剪切波弹性成像测量的病变与脂肪比值是否有可能进一步细化单独使用 B 模式超声对乳腺癌诊断的评估。
这是一项国际诊断多中心试验(NCT02638935)的二次分析。对 1288 例经传统 B 模式超声分类为 BI-RADS 3 和 4a-c 的乳腺病变患者的数据进行了分析,重点是区分 BI-RADS 3 和 BI-RADS 4a 分类的病变。所有女性均接受剪切波弹性成像检查,并以组织病理学评估为参考标准。评估使用剪切波弹性成像测量的病变与脂肪比值进行重新分类后良性活检的减少以及漏诊恶性肿瘤的数量。
1288 例病变中诊断为乳腺癌 368 例(28.6%)。常规 B 模式超声评估导致 53.8%(495 例)病理良性病变被归类为 BI-RADS 4,因此为假阳性,1.39%(6 例)未检出的恶性肿瘤被归类为 BI-RADS 3。在 BI-RADS 4a 病变中,病变与脂肪比值的附加值为 1.85,导致 30.11%的良性病变进行活检,相当于减少了 44.04%的假阳性。
在 BI-RADS 4a 乳腺病变中,将剪切波弹性成像测量的病变与脂肪比值添加到常规 B 模式超声中,可以帮助减少 44.04%的良性活检。然而,同时也漏诊了 1.98%的恶性肿瘤,这仍符合美国放射学院 BI-RADS 3 定义的<2%的未检出恶性肿瘤。