Suppr超能文献

弗里德赖希共济失调中小脑认知情感综合征的决定因素。

Determinant of the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in Friedreich's ataxia.

作者信息

Destrebecq V, Comet C, Deveylder F, Alaerts N, Naeije G

机构信息

Department of Neurology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Laboratoire de Neuroanatomie et de Neuroimagerie translationnelles (LN2T), UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2023 Jun;270(6):2969-2974. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11623-3. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals with Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) display significantly lower performances in many cognitive domains with a pattern of impairment that falls within the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS).

OBJECTIVE

To assess in a large cohort of individuals with FRDA, the main determinant of the CCAS using multiple variable regression models.

METHODS

This is a monocentric observational study that included 39 individuals with FRDA. Ataxic motor symptoms were evaluated with the SARA and cognitive functions with the CCAS-Scale (CCAS-S). Age, SARA, GAA1, Age of symptoms onset (ASO), Age and disease duration (DD) were chosen as covariates in a linear regression model to predict CCAS-S failed items and covariates in a logistic regression model to predict definite CCAS.

RESULTS

Patients mean age, SARA score, ASO, DD and GAA1 were respectively of 29 ± 14, 22 ± 10, 14 ± 11, 15 ± 9 and 712 ± 238 (4 point-mutations). Mean CCAS-S raw score was of 86 ± 16, mean number of failed items was 2.9 ± 1.6. Twenty-three individuals had definite CCAS. The multiple linear regression model with age, SARA, ASO, DD & GAA1 as covariates was statistically significant to predict CCAS-S failed items. The SARA was the only significant coefficient in regression models for predicting CCAS-S failed items number and the definite CCAS occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

CCAS is highly prevalent in adult individuals with FRDA. CCAS is predicted by ataxic motor symptoms severity. This finding supports common core cerebellar pathophysiology in both cognitive and motor symptoms in FRDA and warrants screening for CCAS, especially in patients with SARA > 20.

摘要

背景

弗里德赖希共济失调(FRDA)患者在许多认知领域的表现显著较低,其损害模式属于小脑认知情感综合征(CCAS)。

目的

在一大群FRDA患者中,使用多变量回归模型评估CCAS的主要决定因素。

方法

这是一项单中心观察性研究,纳入了39名FRDA患者。使用共济失调评定量表(SARA)评估共济失调运动症状,使用CCAS量表(CCAS-S)评估认知功能。在一个线性回归模型中,选择年龄、SARA、GAA1、症状发作年龄(ASO)、年龄和病程(DD)作为协变量,以预测CCAS-S未通过项目;在一个逻辑回归模型中,选择这些协变量以预测明确的CCAS。

结果

患者的平均年龄、SARA评分、ASO、DD和GAA1分别为29±14、22±10、14±11、15±9和712±238(4种点突变)。CCAS-S原始平均评分为86±16,未通过项目的平均数量为2.9±1.6。23名个体有明确的CCAS。以年龄、SARA、ASO、DD和GAA1作为协变量的多元线性回归模型对预测CCAS-S未通过项目具有统计学意义。SARA是预测CCAS-S未通过项目数量和明确CCAS发生的回归模型中唯一显著的系数。

结论

CCAS在成年FRDA患者中高度流行。CCAS可由共济失调运动症状的严重程度预测。这一发现支持了FRDA认知和运动症状中共同的核心小脑病理生理学,并值得对CCAS进行筛查,尤其是在SARA>20的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验