Renal, Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kidney360. 2023 Apr 1;4(4):e505-e514. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000082. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
Directly studying plasma refill rate (PRR) during hemodialysis (HD) can offer insight into physiologic mechanisms that change throughout HD. PRR at the start and during HD is associated with intradialytic hypotension, independent of ultrafiltration rate. A rising PRR during HD may be an early indicator of compensatory mechanisms for impending circulatory instability.
Attaining the optimal balance between achieving adequate volume removal while preserving organ perfusion is a challenge for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Current strategies to guide ultrafiltration are inadequate.
We developed an approach to calculate the plasma refill rate (PRR) throughout HD using hematocrit and ultrafiltration data in a retrospective cohort of patients receiving maintenance HD at 17 dialysis units from January 2017 to October 2019. We studied whether () PRR is associated with traditional risk factors for hemodynamic instability using logistic regression, () low starting PRR is associated with intradialytic hypotension (IDH) using Cox proportional hazard regression, and () time-varying PRR throughout HD is associated with hypotension using marginal structural modeling.
During 180,319 HD sessions among 2554 patients, PRR had high within-patient and between-patient variability. Female sex and hypoalbuminemia were associated with low PRR at multiple time points during the first hour of HD. Low starting PRR has a higher hazard of IDH, whereas high starting PRR was protective (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.35 versus HR, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.85, respectively). However, when accounting for time-varying PRR and time-varying confounders, compared with a moderate PRR, while a consistently low PRR was associated with increased risk of hypotension (odds ratio [OR], 1.09, 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.16), a consistently high PRR had a stronger association with hypotension within the next 15 minutes (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.45).
We present a straightforward technique to quantify plasma refill that could easily integrate with devices that monitor hematocrit during HD. Our study highlights how examining patterns of plasma refill may enhance our understanding of circulatory changes during HD, an important step to understand how current technology might be used to improve hemodynamic instability.
在血液透析(HD)期间直接研究血浆再充盈率(PRR)可以深入了解整个 HD 期间发生变化的生理机制。HD 开始时和期间的 PRR 与透析中低血压相关,与超滤率无关。HD 期间 PRR 升高可能是即将发生循环不稳定的代偿机制的早期指标。
对于接受维持性血液透析(HD)的患者来说,在实现充分的容量去除与维持器官灌注之间达到最佳平衡是一项挑战。目前指导超滤的策略还不够完善。
我们使用 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月在 17 个透析单位接受维持性 HD 的患者的回顾性队列中的血细胞比容和超滤数据,开发了一种计算整个 HD 期间血浆再充盈率(PRR)的方法。我们研究了 () PRR 是否与血流动力学不稳定的传统危险因素相关,使用逻辑回归, () 低起始 PRR 是否与透析中低血压(IDH)相关,使用 Cox 比例风险回归,以及 () 整个 HD 期间时变 PRR 是否与低血压相关,使用边缘结构模型。
在 2554 名患者的 180319 次 HD 期间,PRR 具有较高的个体内和个体间变异性。女性和低白蛋白血症与 HD 开始后 1 小时内的多个时间点的低 PRR 相关。低起始 PRR 发生 IDH 的风险较高,而高起始 PRR 具有保护作用(危险比 [HR],1.26,95%置信区间 [CI],1.18 至 1.35 与 HR,0.79,95%CI,0.73 至 0.85,分别)。然而,在考虑时变 PRR 和时变混杂因素后,与中等 PRR 相比,持续低 PRR 与低血压风险增加相关(优势比 [OR],1.09,95%CI,1.02 至 1.16),持续高 PRR 与下 15 分钟内的低血压具有更强的相关性(OR,1.38,95%CI,1.30 至 1.45)。
我们提出了一种简单的量化血浆再充盈的技术,该技术可以很容易地与在 HD 期间监测血细胞比容的设备集成。我们的研究强调了检查血浆再充盈模式如何增强我们对 HD 期间循环变化的理解,这是理解当前技术如何用于改善血流动力学不稳定的重要一步。