Guimarães Marta, Pereira Ana Marta, Pereira Sofia S, Almeida Rui, Lobato Carolina B, Hartmann Bolette, Holst Jens J, Nora Mário, Monteiro Mariana P
Department of General Surgery, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal; UMIB - Unidade Multidisciplinar de Investigação Biomédica, ICBAS - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; ITR - Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Portugal.
Department of General Surgery, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Mar-Apr;17(2):166-170. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
Given the common anatomical features and similar short-term weight loss outcomes, Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS) and Single-Anastomosis Duodenoileal bypass with Sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) are considered identical bariatric procedures, apart from technical complexity being lower for SADI-S. In the absence of prospective randomized trials or long-term comparative studies the rationale for choosing between procedures is hampered. Post-bariatric hormonal profiles could contribute to understand the underlying mechanisms and potentially be used as a decision aid when choosing between procedures. The main aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of BPD/DS and SADI-S, in genetically identical individuals exposed to similar environmental factors. Two identical twin (T) female patients, one submitted to BPD/DS (T_BPD/DS) and another to SADIS-S (T_SADI-S) were followed up to one year after surgery. Before surgery and at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, both patients underwent mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) to evaluate postprandial glucose, glucagon and GLP-1 response. In addition, 3 months after surgery, glucose dynamics were assessed using a Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) system for 14 days. The percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was higher for T_BPD/DS compared to T_SADI-S (34.03 vs 29.03 %). During MMTT, T_BPD/DS presented lower glucose, glucagon, insulin and C-peptide excursions at all timepoints when compared to SADI-S; along with a greater percentage of time within the low glucose range (55.97 vs 39.93 %) and numerically lower glucose variability indexes on FGM (MAG change:0.51 vs 0.63 mmol/l×h). In patients with the same genetic background, BPD/DS was shown to result in greater weight loss than SADI-S. The differences in glucose and enteropancreatic hormone profiles observed after BPD/DS and SADI-S suggest that different mechanisms underlie weight loss.
鉴于共同的解剖学特征和相似的短期体重减轻结果,除了SADI-S的技术复杂性较低外,胆胰转流十二指肠转位术(BPD/DS)和单吻合十二指肠回肠旁路术联合袖状胃切除术(SADI-S)被认为是相同的减肥手术。由于缺乏前瞻性随机试验或长期比较研究,在这两种手术之间进行选择的理由受到了阻碍。减肥后的激素谱可能有助于理解潜在机制,并有可能在选择手术时作为决策辅助工具。本研究的主要目的是比较在暴露于相似环境因素的基因相同个体中BPD/DS和SADI-S的手术效果。两名同卵双胞胎(T)女性患者,一名接受了BPD/DS手术(T_BPD/DS),另一名接受了SADI-S手术(T_SADI-S),术后随访一年。在手术前以及术后3、6和12个月,两名患者均接受了混合餐耐量试验(MMTT),以评估餐后血糖、胰高血糖素和GLP-1反应。此外,术后3个月,使用动态血糖监测(FGM)系统评估14天的血糖动态变化。与T_SADI-S相比,T_BPD/DS的总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)更高(34.03%对29.03%)。在MMTT期间,与SADI-S相比,T_BPD/DS在所有时间点的血糖、胰高血糖素、胰岛素和C肽波动均较低;同时,处于低血糖范围的时间百分比更高(55.97%对39.93%),FGM上的血糖变异性指数在数值上更低(平均血糖变化:0.51对0.63 mmol/l×h)。在具有相同遗传背景的患者中,BPD/DS比SADI-S导致更多的体重减轻。BPD/DS和SADI-S术后观察到的血糖和肠胰激素谱差异表明,体重减轻的潜在机制不同。