Suppr超能文献

非关节造影 MRI、常规 MRI 关节造影和 3D 高分辨率 T1 加权 VIBE MRI 关节造影对肩盂裸区的检测:与 CT 关节造影的比较。

Detection of the glenoid bare spot by non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography: comparison with CT arthrography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Duzce University, Arapçiftliği MahallesiNumara 10, 2901, Sokak, Duzce, Turkey.

Ankara Bayindir Private Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3276-3285. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09443-0. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, and 3D T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography sequences as compared with a CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent non-arthrographic MR imaging, conventional MR arthrography, VIBE MRI arthrography, and CT arthrogram between January 2011 and March 2022 was conducted. The diagnostic accuracy of non-arthrographic MR imaging, direct MR arthrography, and VIBE MRI arthrography in the detection of glenoid bare spot was compared with that of CT arthrography. All studies were reviewed by 2 MSK radiologists. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings was calculated.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 216 patients were excluded. Twenty-three of 200 shoulders had glenoid bare spot on CT arthrographic images. The glenoid bare spot was detected in 11 (47.8%) and 7 (30.4%) patients on conventional non-arthrographic MR images and in 18 (78.3%) and 16 (69.6%) patients on conventional MR arthrograms by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Both observers separately described the bare spot in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) on 3D volumetric MR arthrograms. Interobserver variabilities were fair agreement for conventional non-arthrographic MR imaging (κ = 0.35, p < 0.05), moderate agreement for conventional MR arthrogram (κ = 0.50, p < 0.05), and near-perfect agreement for 3D volumetric MR arthrogram reading (κ = 0.87, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may yield diagnostic performance that is comparable with that of CT arthrography in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot.

KEY POINTS

•Glenoid bare spot should not be misdiagnosed as a transchondral defect of the glenoid surface by radiologists. •A 3D high-resolution T1-weighted VIBE MR arthrography sequence may be used as a high-sensitivity imaging technique in the diagnosis of glenoid bare spot.

摘要

目的

比较非关节造影磁共振成像、常规磁共振关节造影和三维 T1 加权容积内插屏气检查(VIBE)磁共振关节造影与 CT 关节造影在诊断肩盂光裸区中的诊断准确性。

方法

对 2011 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月期间进行非关节造影磁共振成像、常规磁共振关节造影、VIBE MRI 关节造影和 CT 关节造影的 216 例患者进行回顾性研究。比较非关节造影磁共振成像、直接磁共振关节造影和 VIBE MRI 关节造影在检测肩盂光裸区中的诊断准确性与 CT 关节造影。两位 MSK 放射科医生对所有研究进行了回顾。计算磁共振成像和磁共振关节造影结果的观察者间一致性。

结果

216 例患者中有 16 例被排除在外。200 个肩中有 23 个在 CT 关节造影图像上有肩盂光裸区。观察者 1 和 2 分别在 11 例(47.8%)和 7 例(30.4%)常规非关节造影磁共振图像上和 18 例(78.3%)和 16 例(69.6%)常规磁共振关节造影图像上检测到肩盂光裸区。两位观察者分别在 23 例患者中的 22 例(95.7%)三维容积磁共振关节造影上描述了光裸区。常规非关节造影磁共振成像的观察者间变异性为适度一致性(κ=0.35,p<0.05),常规磁共振关节造影为中度一致性(κ=0.50,p<0.05),三维容积磁共振关节造影为高度一致性(κ=0.87,p<0.05)。

结论

三维高分辨率 T1 加权 VIBE MR 关节造影序列在诊断肩盂光裸区方面的诊断性能可与 CT 关节造影相媲美。

关键点

  • 放射科医生不应将肩盂光裸区误诊为肩盂表面的跨软骨缺损。

  • 三维高分辨率 T1 加权 VIBE MR 关节造影序列可作为诊断肩盂光裸区的高灵敏度成像技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验