Suppr超能文献

一项可行性随机对照试验,作为评估数字健康仪表盘在儿童预防性保健中有效性的第一步:一种混合方法。

A feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial as a first step towards evaluating the effectiveness of a digital health dashboard in preventive child health care: a mixed methods approach.

作者信息

Weijers Miriam, Boumans Nicolle, van der Zwet Jonne, Feron Frans, Bastiaenen Caroline

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Feb 15;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01214-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within preventive Child Health Care (CHC), the 360°CHILD-profile has been developed. This digital tool visualises and theoretically orders holistic health data in line with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. It is anticipated that evaluating the effectiveness of the multifunctional 360°CHILD-profile within the preventive CHC-context is complex. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the feasibility of RCT procedures and the applicability of potential outcome measures for assessing the accessibility and transfer of health information.

METHODS

During the first introduction of the 360°CHILD-profile in CHC practice, a feasibility RCT with an explanatory-sequential mixed methods design was executed. CHC professionals (n=38) recruited parents (n=30) who visited the CHC for their child (age 0-16). Parents were randomised to "care as usual" (n=15) or "care as usual with, in addition, the availability of a personalised 360°CHILD-profile during 6 months" (n=15). Quantitative data on RCT feasibility were collected on recruitment, retention, response, compliance rates and outcome data on accessibility and transfer of health information (n=26). Subsequently, thirteen semi-structured interviews (5 parents, 8 CHC professionals) and a member check focus group (6 CHC professionals) were performed to further explore and gain a deeper understanding of quantitative findings.

RESULTS

Integration of qualitative and quantitative data revealed that the recruitment of parents by CHC professionals was problematic and influenced by organisational factors. The used randomisation strategy, interventions and measurements were executable within the setting of this specific study. The outcome measures showed skewed outcome data in both groups and a low applicability to measure accessibility and transfer of health information. The study revealed points to reconsider regarding the randomisation and recruitment strategy and measures in the next steps.

CONCLUSIONS

This mixed methods feasibility study enabled us to gain a broad insight into the feasibility of executing an RCT within the CHC context. Trained research staff should recruit parents instead of CHC professionals. Measures, potentially for evaluating 360°CHILD-profile's effectiveness, need further exploration and thorough piloting before proceeding with the evaluation process. Overall findings revealed that executing an RCT within the context of evaluating 360°CHILD-profile's effectiveness in the CHC setting will be much more complex, time-consuming and costly than expected. Thereby, the CHC context requires a more complex randomisation strategy than executed during this feasibility study. Alternative designs including mixed methods research must be considered for the next phases of the downstream validation process.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NTR6909; https://trialsearch.who.int/ .

摘要

背景

在儿童预防保健(CHC)中,已开发出360°儿童健康档案。这个数字工具根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》对整体健康数据进行可视化呈现并从理论上进行排序。预计在预防性儿童保健背景下评估多功能360°儿童健康档案的有效性是复杂的。因此,本研究旨在调查随机对照试验(RCT)程序的可行性以及潜在结果指标在评估健康信息的可及性和传递方面的适用性。

方法

在CHC实践中首次引入360°儿童健康档案期间,执行了一项采用解释性序列混合方法设计的可行性随机对照试验。CHC专业人员(n = 38)招募了带孩子(0 - 16岁)前来CHC就诊的家长(n = 30)。家长被随机分为“常规护理”组(n = 15)或“常规护理外加在6个月内可获取个性化360°儿童健康档案”组(n = 15)。收集了关于随机对照试验可行性的定量数据,包括招募、留存、应答、依从率以及关于健康信息可及性和传递的结果数据(n = 26)。随后,进行了13次半结构化访谈(5名家长,8名CHC专业人员)和一次成员核对焦点小组访谈(6名CHC专业人员),以进一步探索并更深入地理解定量研究结果。

结果

定性和定量数据的整合表明,CHC专业人员招募家长存在问题,且受到组织因素的影响。所采用的随机化策略、干预措施和测量方法在本特定研究的背景下是可行的。结果指标显示两组的结果数据存在偏差,且在测量健康信息的可及性和传递方面适用性较低。该研究揭示了在后续步骤中关于随机化和招募策略及措施需重新考虑的要点。

结论

这项混合方法可行性研究使我们能够广泛了解在CHC背景下开展随机对照试验的可行性。应由经过培训的研究人员而非CHC专业人员招募家长。在继续评估过程之前,可能用于评估360°儿童健康档案有效性的措施需要进一步探索和全面试点。总体研究结果表明,在CHC环境中评估360°儿童健康档案有效性的背景下开展随机对照试验将比预期更加复杂、耗时且成本高昂。因此,CHC背景需要比本可行性研究中执行的更为复杂的随机化策略。在下游验证过程的后续阶段必须考虑包括混合方法研究在内的替代设计。

试验注册

NTR6909;https://trialsearch.who.int/

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0730/9930344/04569d64fb15/40814_2022_1214_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验