Suppr超能文献

系列:定性研究实用指南。第 4 部分:可信性和出版。

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.

机构信息

a Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre for Midwifery Science , Zuyd University of Applied Sciences , Maastricht , The Netherlands.

b Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre Autonomy and Participation of Chronically Ill People , Zuyd University of Applied Sciences , Heerlen , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

Abstract

In the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By 'novice' we mean Master's students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The first article provides an introduction to this series. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs. The third article focused on sampling, data collection and analysis. This fourth article addresses FAQs about trustworthiness and publishing. Quality criteria for all qualitative research are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Reflexivity is an integral part of ensuring the transparency and quality of qualitative research. Writing a qualitative research article reflects the iterative nature of the qualitative research process: data analysis continues while writing. A qualitative research article is mostly narrative and tends to be longer than a quantitative paper, and sometimes requires a different structure. Editors essentially use the criteria: is it new, is it true, is it relevant? An effective cover letter enhances confidence in the newness, trueness and relevance, and explains why your study required a qualitative design. It provides information about the way you applied quality criteria or a checklist, and you can attach the checklist to the manuscript.

摘要

在多年的监督工作中,我们注意到定性研究往往会引起很多问题和担忧,即所谓的常见问题(FAQ)。这一系列四篇文章旨在为初级保健中进行高质量定性研究的新手研究人员提供实用指南。通过“新手”,我们指的是硕士研究生和初级研究人员,以及首次从事定性研究的经验丰富的定量研究人员。本系列文章解答了他们的问题,并为研究人员、读者、评论员和编辑提供了判断定性研究论文质量的标准和工具的参考。第一篇文章介绍了本系列文章。第二篇文章重点介绍了背景、研究问题和设计。第三篇文章重点介绍了抽样、数据收集和分析。这第四篇文章解答了关于可信度和出版的常见问题。所有定性研究的质量标准是可信度、可转移性、可靠性和可确认性。反身性是确保定性研究透明度和质量的一个组成部分。撰写定性研究文章反映了定性研究过程的迭代性质:数据分析在写作过程中继续进行。定性研究文章大多是叙述性的,往往比定量论文长,有时需要不同的结构。编辑基本上使用以下标准:它是新的吗?它是真实的吗?它是相关的吗?一封有效的求职信增强了对新颖性、真实性和相关性的信心,并解释了为什么您的研究需要定性设计。它提供了有关您应用质量标准或检查表的方式的信息,并且您可以将检查表附加到手稿中。

相似文献

1
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
3
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):274-279. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090.
4
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):271-273. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093.
5
Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Oct;16(10):1472-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Why the (QHR) Review Process Does Not Use Checklists.
Qual Health Res. 2021 Apr;31(5):819-821. doi: 10.1177/1049732321994114.
7
Making Meaning Matter: an Editor's Perspective on Publishing Qualitative Research.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):301-305. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08361-7. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
So you want to do research? 6: Reporting research.
Br J Community Nurs. 2004 Jan;9(1):37-41. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.1.11935.
9
[Guide to write a scientific article].
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):101424. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2023.101424. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
10
Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2743-2748. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab195.

引用本文的文献

1
The Process From Turnover Intention to Turnover Decision in Chinese Nurses With Master's Degree: A Grounded Theory Study.
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Aug 24;2025:6574378. doi: 10.1155/jonm/6574378. eCollection 2025.
3
Researcher and community partner perspectives on community-engaged research during the COVID-19 pandemic.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul 7;9(1):e163. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10090. eCollection 2025.
5
Option talk and risk communication with people with limited health literacy: A qualitative focus group study with key stakeholders.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0330191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330191. eCollection 2025.
6
Humanized Care in Nursing Practice: A Phenomenological Study of Professional Experiences in a Public Hospital.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;22(8):1223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081223.
9
Nurturing comfort: qualitative exploration of pain management techniques among urban teaching hospital nurses.
Pain Rep. 2025 Aug 20;10(5):e1325. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001325. eCollection 2025 Oct.
10
Influential Factors on Participation in Mental Health Research:Directing Future Research Methods.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01894-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
2
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):271-273. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093.
3
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):274-279. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090.
4
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
6
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
7
A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research.
Int J Nurs Stud. 1998 Feb-Apr;35(1-2):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00014-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验