Adjustable compression wraps: stretch, interface pressures and static stiffness indices.

BACKGROUND

Adjustable compression wraps (ACWs) may represent the future of compression for the treatment of the most severe stages of chronic venous diseases and lymphedema. We tested in five healthy subjects: Coolflex® from Sigvaris®; Juzo wrap 6000®, Readywrap® from Lohmann Rauscher®; Juxtafit® and Juxtalite® from Medi®, Compreflex® from Sigvaris®. The objective of this pilot study was to study the stretch, interface pressures, and Static Stiffness Index (SSI) of the six ACWs applied to the leg.

METHODS

The stretch was evaluated by stretching the ACWs to their maximum length. Interface pressure measurements were performed using a PicoPress transducer and a probe placed at point B1. Interface pressures were measured in the supine resting position and in the standing position. We calculated the SSI. We started the measurements at 20 mmHg in the supine position and increased the pressures by 5 mmHg to 5 mmHg.

RESULTS

Coolflex® (inelastic ACW) cannot exceed a maximum pressure of 30 mmHg at rest with a maximum SSI of approximately 30 mmHg. Juzo wrap 6000® (a 50% stretch) and Readywrap® (a 60% stretch) have a profile of stiffness very near one to the other. The optimal stiffness for Juzo is from 16 mmHg to of 30 mmHg for a resting pressure between 25 mmHg and 40 mmHg. For Readywrap, the optimal stiffness is from 17 mmHg to 30 mmHg with a maximum SSI of 35mmHg. The optimal application zone of this wrap at rest is 30 to 45 mmHg. Juxtafit®, Juxtalite® and Compreflex® (respectively 70%, 80%, 124% stretch) can be applied with pressures above 60 mmHg but with maximum SSI of 20 mmHg for Circaid® and>30 mmHg for Compreflex®.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study allows us to propose a classification of wraps according to their stretch: inelastic ACW and short or long stretch ACW (50-60% and 70%, 80%, and 124% stretch). Their stretch and stiffness could help to better determine what could be expected of ACWs in clinical practice.