Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dept. of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute (CVRI) Dublin, Mater Private Network, Dublin, Ireland; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Am Heart J. 2023 Jun;260:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions to guide coronary revascularization is currently recommended by international guidelines. Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) has emerged as a new approach to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from 3D-quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) without the need for hyperemic agents or pressure wires.
The FAST III is an investigator-initiated, open label, multicenter randomized trial comparing vFFR guided versus FFR guided coronary revascularization in approximately 2228 patients with intermediate coronary lesions (defined as 30%-80% stenosis by visual assessment or QCA). Intermediate lesions are physiologically assessed using on-line vFFR or FFR and treated if vFFR or FFR ≤0.80. The primary end point is a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization at 1-year post-randomization. Secondary end points include the individual components of the primary end point and cost-effectiveness will be investigated.
FAST III is the first randomized trial to explore whether a vFFR guided revascularization strategy is non-inferior to an FFR guided strategy in terms of clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions.
目前国际指南推荐对中等程度冠状动脉病变进行生理学评估,以指导冠状动脉血运重建。血管血流储备分数(vFFR)是一种从三维定量冠状动脉造影(3D-QCA)中获得血流储备分数(FFR)的新方法,无需使用扩血管药物或压力导丝。
FAST III 是一项由研究者发起的、开放标签的、多中心随机试验,比较了 vFFR 指导与 FFR 指导的中等程度冠状动脉病变(通过目测或 QCA 定义为 30%-80%狭窄)血运重建。使用在线 vFFR 或 FFR 对中等程度病变进行生理学评估,如果 vFFR 或 FFR ≤0.80,则进行治疗。主要终点是随机分组后 1 年时全因死亡、任何心肌梗死或任何血运重建的复合终点。次要终点包括主要终点的各个组成部分,并将调查成本效益。
FAST III 是第一项随机试验,旨在探索在中等程度冠状动脉病变患者中,vFFR 指导的血运重建策略在 1 年随访时的临床结局是否不劣于 FFR 指导的策略。