Department of Sociology Loyola University Chicago 1032 W. Sheridan Rd. Chicago, IL 60660, USA.
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Feb;110:102845. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102845. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
Previous research on the survey measurement of sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE) often focuses on the measurement of identity, with comparably little research focused on gender expression as a key feature of how gender is lived and experienced. This study examines the reliability and validity of survey questions about gender expression in a 2-by-5-by-2 factorial experiment that varies the question order, type of response scale, and the order of gender presentation in the response scale. The results indicate that the effect of which (side of the) scale is presented first on gender expression varies by gender for each of the unipolar items and one of the bipolar items (behavior). In addition, the unipolar items also show distinctions among the gender minority population in ratings of gender expression as well as more nuance with respect to concurrent validity in predicting health outcomes among cisgender respondents. The results of this study have implications for researchers who are interested in accounting for gender holistically in survey and health disparities research.
先前关于性取向、性别认同和性别表达(SOGIE)调查测量的研究通常侧重于身份的测量,而对性别表达作为性别体验和表现的关键特征的研究相对较少。本研究通过一个 2×5×2 的因子实验检验了关于性别表达的调查问题的可靠性和有效性,该实验改变了问题顺序、回答量表的类型以及回答量表中性别呈现的顺序。结果表明,在每个单极项目和一个双极项目(行为)中,呈现的量表(哪一侧)的顺序对性别表达的影响因性别而异。此外,在性别表达的评分方面,单极项目也显示出性别少数群体之间的区别,以及在预测顺性别受访者的健康结果方面的同时效度方面的细微差别。本研究的结果对那些有兴趣在调查和健康差异研究中全面考虑性别的研究人员具有重要意义。