• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院外心脏骤停后与机械胸外按压和主动减压相关的损伤:一项随机研究中未存活者的亚组分析。

Injuries associated with mechanical chest compressions and active decompressions after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A subgroup analysis of non-survivors from a randomized study.

作者信息

Petrovich Polina, Berve Per Olav, Barth-Heyerdahl Roald Borghild, Wahl Kongsgård Håvard, Stray-Pedersen Arne, Kramer-Johansen Jo, Wik Lars

机构信息

Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2023 Jan 31;13:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100362. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100362
PMID:36798487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both skeletal and visceral injuries are reported after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical study describes/compares autopsy documented injury patterns caused by two mechanical, piston-based chest compression devices: standard LUCAS® 2 (control) and LUCAS® 2 with active decompression (AD, intervention) in non-survivors with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA).

METHOD

We compared injuries documented by autopsies (medical/forensic) after control and intervention CPR based on written relatives consent to use patients' data. The pathologists were blinded for the device used. The cause of CA and injuries reported were based on a prespecified study autopsy template. We used Pearson's chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis with an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

221 patients were included in the main study (April 2015-April 2017) and 207 did not survive. Of these, 114 (55%, 64 control and 50 intervention) underwent medical ( = 73) or forensic ( = 41) autopsy. The cause of CA was cardiac 53%, respiratory 17%, overdose/intoxication 14%, ruptured aorta 10%, neurological 1%, and other 5%. There were no differences between control and intervention in the incidence of rib fractures (67% vs 72%; -value = 0.58), or sternal fractures (44% vs 48%; -value = 0.65), respectively. The most frequent non-skeletal complication was bleeding (26% of all patients) and intrathoracic was the most common location. Ten of the 114 patients had internal organ injuries, where lungs were most affected.

CONCLUSION

In non-survivors of OHCA patients, the most frequent cause of cardiac arrest was cardiogenic. Skeletal and non-skeletal fractures/injuries were found in both control and intervention groups. Bleeding was the most common non-skeletal complication. Internal organ injuries were rare.

摘要

背景

心肺复苏(CPR)后既有骨骼损伤也有内脏损伤的报道。这项随机临床研究的亚组分析描述/比较了两种基于活塞的机械胸外按压装置导致的尸检记录损伤模式:标准LUCAS® 2(对照组)和具有主动减压功能的LUCAS® 2(AD,干预组),研究对象为院外心脏骤停(CA)的非存活者。

方法

在获得亲属书面同意使用患者数据后,我们比较了对照组和干预组CPR后尸检(医学/法医)记录的损伤情况。病理学家对所使用的装置不知情。CA的病因和报告的损伤情况基于预先指定的研究尸检模板。我们使用Pearson卡方检验和逻辑回归分析,α水平为0.05。

结果

221例患者纳入主要研究(2015年4月至2017年4月),207例未存活。其中,114例(55%,64例对照组和50例干预组)接受了医学(n = 73)或法医(n = 41)尸检。CA的病因是心脏原因占53%,呼吸原因占17%,药物过量/中毒占14%,主动脉破裂占10%,神经原因占1%,其他占5%。对照组和干预组肋骨骨折发生率(67%对72%;P值 = 0.58)或胸骨骨折发生率(44%对48%;P值 = 0.65)无差异。最常见的非骨骼并发症是出血(占所有患者的26%),胸腔内是最常见的部位。114例患者中有10例出现内脏损伤,其中肺部受影响最严重。

结论

在院外心脏骤停患者的非存活者中,心脏骤停最常见的原因是心源性的。对照组和干预组均发现了骨骼和非骨骼骨折/损伤。出血是最常见的非骨骼并发症。内脏损伤很少见。

相似文献

1
Injuries associated with mechanical chest compressions and active decompressions after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A subgroup analysis of non-survivors from a randomized study.院外心脏骤停后与机械胸外按压和主动减压相关的损伤:一项随机研究中未存活者的亚组分析。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jan 31;13:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100362. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) - a forensic autopsy-based comparison.心脏骤停患者使用徒手胸外按压与自动胸外按压设备(LUCAS II)进行治疗时与胸外按压相关的损伤——基于法医尸检的比较
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018 Dec;14(4):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s12024-018-0024-5. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
CPR-related injuries after manual or mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device: a multicentre study of victims after unsuccessful resuscitation.使用LUCAS™设备进行手动或机械胸外按压后与心肺复苏相关的损伤:对复苏失败受害者的多中心研究
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
4
Traumatic Injuries Following Mechanical versus Manual Chest Compression.机械胸外按压与徒手胸外按压后的创伤性损伤
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 4;14:557-562. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S374785. eCollection 2022.
5
Mechanical active compression-decompression versus standard mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised haemodynamic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study.机械主动按压-减压与标准机械心肺复苏:一项院外心脏骤停的随机血流动力学研究。
Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
6
Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation.院外心脏骤停时机械压迫装置的院前随机评估(PARAMEDIC):一项实用的整群随机试验及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(11):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta21110.
7
Skeletal and soft tissue injuries after manual and mechanical chest compressions.手法和机械胸外按压后的骨骼和软组织损伤。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Jul 1;5(3):259-265. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy062.
8
No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device--a pilot study.与使用LUCAS设备进行机械按压相比,接受手动胸外按压治疗的心脏骤停患者在尸检中发现的损伤并无差异——一项初步研究。
Resuscitation. 2009 Oct;80(10):1104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.010.
9
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study.在引入机械胸外按压设备LUCAS-2前后院外心脏骤停患者的心肺复苏质量:一项前瞻性观察研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Apr 22;23:37. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0114-2.
10
Comparison of complications secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital cardiac arrest.比较院外心脏骤停和院内心脏骤停心肺复苏后并发症。
Resuscitation. 2016 Jan;98:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-Related Head Trauma: A Case Report.心肺复苏相关头部创伤:一例报告
Reports (MDPI). 2023 Oct 19;6(4):50. doi: 10.3390/reports6040050.
2
Acute Lung Injury after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Narrative Review.心肺复苏术后急性肺损伤:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2498. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092498.

本文引用的文献

1
Chest wall mechanics during mechanical chest compression and its relationship to CPR-related injuries and survival.机械胸外按压期间胸壁力学及其与心肺复苏相关损伤和生存的关系。
Resusc Plus. 2022 May 11;10:100242. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100242. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
CPR-related injuries after non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Survivors versus non-survivors.非创伤性院外心脏骤停后与心肺复苏相关的损伤:幸存者与非幸存者。
Resuscitation. 2022 Feb;171:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.12.036. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
3
Mechanical active compression-decompression versus standard mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised haemodynamic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study.机械主动按压-减压与标准机械心肺复苏:一项院外心脏骤停的随机血流动力学研究。
Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Metrics of mechanical chest compression device use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时机械胸外按压装置的使用指标
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jul 4;1(6):1214-1221. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12184. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) - a forensic autopsy-based comparison.心脏骤停患者使用徒手胸外按压与自动胸外按压设备(LUCAS II)进行治疗时与胸外按压相关的损伤——基于法医尸检的比较
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018 Dec;14(4):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s12024-018-0024-5. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
6
Risk factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related injuries sustained during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.院外心脏骤停心肺复苏相关损伤的危险因素。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Oct;62(9):1290-1296. doi: 10.1111/aas.13155. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
Haemodynamic outcomes during piston-based mechanical CPR with or without active decompression in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.基于活塞的机械心肺复苏术在伴有或不伴有主动减压时对心脏骤停猪模型血流动力学的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 24;26(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0496-z.
8
Frequency and influencing factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related injuries during implementation of the American Heart Association 2010 Guidelines: a retrospective study based on autopsy and postmortem computed tomography.美国心脏协会 2010 指南实施过程中心肺复苏相关损伤的频率及影响因素:基于尸检和死后计算机断层扫描的回顾性研究。
Int J Legal Med. 2017 Nov;131(6):1655-1663. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1673-8. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
9
Frequency and number of resuscitation related rib and sternum fractures are higher than generally considered.与复苏相关的肋骨和胸骨骨折的发生率及数量高于普遍认知。
Resuscitation. 2015 Aug;93:136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Active compression-decompression resuscitation and impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.院外心脏骤停的主动压缩-减压复苏和阻抗阈值装置:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):889-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000820.