Nivedha V M, Balakrishnan Nivethigaa, Sreenivasagan Swapna
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Dec;13(Suppl 2):S514-S518. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_187_22. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
This survey aimed at evaluating the knowledge and awareness regarding the various retention protocols used in orthodontic practice. A survey has been conducted among the dental students by circulating 15 close-ended questions online to analyze the data collected on the protocols and trends in orthodontic retention. The male and female distribution among the study population was evaluated, and the retention protocols used were computed; statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Ninety-four percent accepted that Hawley retainers are predominantly used compared to fixed retainers. Eighty-seven percent agreed that they aim at a more stable dentition by the completion of orthodontic treatment. The Chi-square test on the knowledge of respondents on the permanent retention to be followed after orthodontic treatment to close generalized spacing is statistically not significant, = 0.056. Within the considered limitations, it is clear that there is awareness among the dentists regarding the use of a retention appliance to ensure stability at the finish of orthodontic treatment. But the protocol for the same remains variable. Further studies can be performed to identify the effectiveness of each of the different retention protocols and their indications in various cases.
本调查旨在评估正畸临床中使用的各种保持方案的相关知识和认知情况。通过在线发放15个封闭式问题对牙科学生进行了一项调查,以分析收集到的关于正畸保持方案和趋势的数据。评估了研究人群中的男女分布情况,并计算了所使用的保持方案;使用SPSS软件进行了统计分析。94%的人认为与固定保持器相比,霍利保持器使用更为普遍。87%的人同意他们的目标是通过完成正畸治疗获得更稳定的牙列。对受访者关于正畸治疗后关闭一般性间隙应采用的永久性保持知识的卡方检验在统计学上不显著,P = 0.056。在考虑的局限性范围内,很明显牙医们对于使用保持器以确保正畸治疗结束时的稳定性是有认知的。但具体方案仍存在差异。可以进行进一步研究以确定每种不同保持方案的有效性及其在各种情况下的适应证。