• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在麻醉犬中,罗库溴铵比顺式阿曲库铵的神经肌肉阻滞时间更具变异性,恢复时间更短。

Duration of neuromuscular block is more variable and recovery time is shorter with rocuronium than cisatracurium in anesthetized dogs.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

出版信息

Vet Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;26(5):407-413. doi: 10.1111/vop.13074. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/vop.13074
PMID:36799561
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the variability in the duration of action of a single dose of rocuronium or cisatracurium, and duration of subsequent top-up doses in anesthetized dogs.

ANIMALS

Thirty dogs requiring ophthalmic surgery with neuromuscular block.

PROCEDURES

Neuromuscular function was monitored with train-of-four (TOF) and acceleromyography. Dogs received an initial dose of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, or cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg IV, which produced complete neuromuscular block. Upon return of the first response (T1) of TOF, a third of the initial dose was repeated. The duration of the initial dose and its variability were compared between agents. Duration of subsequent top-up doses was assessed with mixed effect models. Spontaneous (from last return of T1) or neostigmine-enhanced (from administration to complete recovery) recovery times were measured for each agent.

RESULTS

Duration of action of the initial dose was [median (range)] 25 (10-60) min with rocuronium and 35 (15-45) min with cisatracurium (p = .231). The variability of rocuronium was 3.25 times larger than cisatracurium (p = .034). Duration of top-up doses did not vary for either agent. Spontaneous recovery was shorter for rocuronium [15 (10-20) min] than cisatracurium [25 (15-45) min] (p = .02). Neostigmine-enhanced recovery times were 5 (5-25) for rocuronium and 10 (5-10) for cisatracurium (p = .491).

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of action for a single dose is significantly more variable with rocuronium than cisatracurium. Time to spontaneous recovery was longer for cisatracurium, and cases of unexpectedly long recovery times were observed with both agents. Objective monitoring is recommended.

摘要

目的

比较罗库溴铵或顺式阿曲库铵单次给药的作用持续时间和随后追加剂量的持续时间在麻醉犬中的差异。

动物

30 只需要眼科手术且接受神经肌肉阻滞的狗。

程序

使用四脉冲串(TOF)和加速肌电图监测神经肌肉功能。狗接受罗库溴铵 0.6mg/kg 或顺式阿曲库铵 0.15mg/kg 静脉注射,以产生完全的神经肌肉阻滞。当 TOF 的第一个反应(T1)恢复时,重复初始剂量的三分之一。比较两种药物的初始剂量及其变异性。使用混合效应模型评估随后追加剂量的持续时间。测量每个药物的自发(从最后一个 T1 恢复开始)或新斯的明增强(从给药到完全恢复)的恢复时间。

结果

初始剂量的作用持续时间为罗库溴铵 25(10-60)分钟和顺式阿曲库铵 35(15-45)分钟(p=0.231)。罗库溴铵的变异性是顺式阿曲库铵的 3.25 倍(p=0.034)。两种药物的追加剂量持续时间均无差异。罗库溴铵的自发恢复时间[15(10-20)分钟]短于顺式阿曲库铵[25(15-45)分钟](p=0.02)。新斯的明增强的恢复时间为罗库溴铵 5(5-25)分钟,顺式阿曲库铵 10(5-10)分钟(p=0.491)。

结论

罗库溴铵单次给药的作用持续时间的变异性明显大于顺式阿曲库铵。顺式阿曲库铵的自发恢复时间较长,两种药物均观察到恢复时间异常延长的情况。建议进行客观监测。

相似文献

1
Duration of neuromuscular block is more variable and recovery time is shorter with rocuronium than cisatracurium in anesthetized dogs.在麻醉犬中,罗库溴铵比顺式阿曲库铵的神经肌肉阻滞时间更具变异性,恢复时间更短。
Vet Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;26(5):407-413. doi: 10.1111/vop.13074. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
[Influence of neostigmine on the course of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium or cisatracurium: a randomized, double-blind trial].[新斯的明对罗库溴铵或顺式阿曲库铵神经肌肉阻滞过程的影响:一项随机双盲试验]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007 Aug-Sep;54(7):399-404.
3
Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine.与新斯的明用于顺式阿曲库铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞逆转相比,舒更葡糖用于罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞逆转更快。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
4
Optimum dose of neostigmine to reverse shallow neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium and cisatracurium.新斯的明逆转罗库溴铵和顺式阿曲库铵所致浅肌松时的最佳剂量。
Anaesthesia. 2016 Apr;71(4):443-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.13398. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
5
A comparison between cisatracurium and rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block on laryngeal electromyography recovery after neostigmine reversal in a porcine model.新斯的明逆转后喉肌电图恢复时顺式阿曲库铵与罗库溴铵引起的神经肌肉阻滞的比较:猪模型研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 8;13:875597. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.875597. eCollection 2022.
6
Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents?新型神经肌肉阻滞剂:与现有药物相比如何?
Drugs. 2001;61(7):919-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161070-00003.
7
Cisatracurium vs. Rocuronium: A prospective, comparative, randomized study in adult patients under total intravenous anaesthesia.顺式阿曲库铵与罗库溴铵的比较:一项在接受全静脉麻醉的成年患者中进行的前瞻性、比较性、随机研究。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2006 Nov;150(2):333-8. doi: 10.5507/bp.2006.051.
8
Postoperative residual curarization with cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions.输注顺式阿曲库铵和罗库溴铵后的术后残余肌松作用。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Feb;19(2):129-34. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000236.
9
Dose-response relationships for neostigmine antagonism of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in children and adults.新斯的明拮抗罗库溴铵诱导的儿童和成人神经肌肉阻滞的剂量-反应关系。
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Dec;77(6):710-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.6.710.
10
Neuromuscular blocking effects and train-of-four fade with cisatracurium: comparison with other nondepolarising relaxants.顺式阿曲库铵的神经肌肉阻滞作用及四个成串刺激衰减:与其他非去极化肌松药的比较
Anaesthesia. 1998 Dec;53(12):1169-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00616.x.