Suppr超能文献

桡骨远端骨折手术修复后的术后镇痛:远端周围神经阻滞与手术部位浸润的随机对照研究

Postoperative analgesia after surgical repair of distal radius fracture: a randomized comparison between distal peripheral nerve blockade and surgical site infiltration.

作者信息

Sciard Didier, Xu Kailai, Soulier Anne, Dufour Guillaume, Ursino Moreno, Alberti Corinne, Beaussier Marc

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Montsouris Mutualist Institute, Paris, France.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Antoine Hospital, Hospitals of Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Oct;89(10):876-883. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.16956-2. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain following open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fracture (DRF) can be significant. This study compared the intensity of pain up to 48 hours after volar plating for DRF, associated to either an ultrasound guided distal nerve block (DNB) or surgical site infiltration (SSI).

METHODS

In this prospective single blind randomized study, 72 patients scheduled for DRF surgery under 1.5% lidocaine axillary block were allocated to receive, at the end of surgery, either an ultrasound-guided median and radial nerves block with ropivacaine 0.375% (DNB) performed by the anesthesiologist or a SSI with the same drug regimen, performed by the surgeon. Primary outcome was the duration between analgesic technique (H0) and pain reappearance (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 0-10)>3). Secondary outcomes were the quality of analgesia, the quality of sleep, the magnitude of motor blockade, and the patient satisfaction. The study was built on a statistical hypothesis of equivalence.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included in the final per-protocol analysis (DNB=30, SSI=29). Time to reach NRS>3 was (in median [95%CI]) 267 min [155;727] and 164 min [120;181] respectively after DNB and SSI (difference=103 min [-22;594] - rejection of equivalence hypothesis). Pain intensity throughout the 48 hours, quality of sleep, opiate consumption, motor blockade and patient satisfaction was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although DNB provides a longer analgesia than SSI, both techniques gave comparable level of pain control during the first 48 hours after surgery, without any difference in the incidence of side effects or patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定术后疼痛可能较为严重。本研究比较了掌侧钢板固定治疗桡骨远端骨折后48小时内,超声引导下正中神经和桡神经阻滞(DNB)与手术部位浸润(SSI)两种方法的疼痛强度。

方法

在这项前瞻性单盲随机研究中,72例计划在1.5%利多卡因腋路阻滞下行桡骨远端骨折手术的患者,在手术结束时被分配接受以下两种方法之一:由麻醉医生进行的0.375%罗哌卡因超声引导下正中神经和桡神经阻滞(DNB),或由外科医生进行的相同药物方案的手术部位浸润(SSI)。主要结局是镇痛技术实施后(H0)至疼痛再次出现(数字评分量表(NRS 0 - 10)>3)的持续时间。次要结局包括镇痛质量、睡眠质量、运动阻滞程度和患者满意度。本研究基于等效性的统计假设。

结果

59例患者纳入最终符合方案分析(DNB组 = 30例,SSI组 = 29例)。DNB组和SSI组达到NRS>3的时间(中位数[95%CI])分别为267分钟[155;727]和164分钟[120;181](差异 = 103分钟[-22;594] - 等效性假设被拒绝)。两组在术后48小时内的疼痛强度、睡眠质量、阿片类药物消耗量、运动阻滞程度和患者满意度方面无显著差异。

结论

虽然DNB提供的镇痛时间比SSI长,但两种技术在术后48小时内的疼痛控制水平相当,副作用发生率和患者满意度无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验