Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1162-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.026. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
The clinicopathological features and the distribution of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1a-MM and T1b-SM1 superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remain unclear; therefore, the optimal treatment strategy is still controversial.
One hundred and ninety-one patients who had undergone a thoracic esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy and who were pathologically confirmed to have thoracic superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma that had reached the T1a-MM or T1b-SM1 stage were retrospectively reviewed. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis, the distribution of lymph node metastasis, and long-term outcomes were evaluated.
A multivariate analysis revealed that lymphovascular invasion was the only independent risk factor of lymph node metastasis (odds ratio: 6.410, P < .001). Patients with primary tumors in the middle thoracic region had lymph node metastasis in all 3 fields, whereas patients with primary tumors in the upper or lower thoracic region did not have distant lymph node metastasis. The frequencies of neck (P = .045) and abdominal (P < .001) lymph node metastasis were significantly higher in lymphovascular invasion-positive patients than those in lymphovascular invasion-negative patients in all cohort. MM/lymphovascular invasion-positive patients with middle thoracic tumors had lymph node metastasis spread from the neck to the abdomen. SM1/lymphovascular invasion-negative patients with middle thoracic tumors did not have lymph node metastasis in the abdominal region. The SM1/pN+ group had a significantly poorer overall survival and relapse-free survival than the other groups.
The present study revealed that lymphovascular invasion was associated with not only the frequency of lymph node metastasis, but also the distribution of lymph node metastasis. It also suggested that superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with T1b-SM1 and lymph node metastasis had a significantly poorer outcome than those with T1a-MM and lymph node metastasis.
T1a-MM 和 T1b-SM1 期胸段浅表性食管鳞癌的临床病理特征及淋巴结转移分布尚不清楚,因此最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。
回顾性分析 191 例接受胸段食管切除术及 3 野淋巴结清扫术,术后病理证实为 T1a-MM 或 T1b-SM1 期胸段浅表性食管鳞癌患者的临床资料。评估淋巴结转移的危险因素、淋巴结转移分布及长期预后。
多因素分析显示,脉管侵犯是淋巴结转移的唯一独立危险因素(比值比:6.410,P<0.001)。原发肿瘤位于胸中段的患者 3 野均有淋巴结转移,而原发肿瘤位于胸上段或下段的患者无远处淋巴结转移。脉管侵犯阳性患者的颈部(P=0.045)和腹部(P<0.001)淋巴结转移频率明显高于脉管侵犯阴性患者。中胸段肿瘤 MM/脉管侵犯阳性患者的淋巴结转移从颈部向腹部扩散。中胸段肿瘤 SM1/脉管侵犯阴性患者无腹部淋巴结转移。SM1/pN+组的总生存和无复发生存均明显差于其他组。
本研究表明脉管侵犯不仅与淋巴结转移频率有关,而且与淋巴结转移分布有关。同时提示 T1b-SM1 期伴淋巴结转移的浅表性食管鳞癌患者预后明显差于 T1a-MM 期伴淋巴结转移的患者。