Fleeker J
North Dakota State University, Biochemistry Department, Fargo 58105.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Sep-Oct;70(5):874-8.
Two solid-phase enzyme immunoassays were developed to measure 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), using 2 sets of structurally distinct immunogens and enzyme ligands. The 2,4-D analog, 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), gave a similar response with both methods, whereas other phenoxy herbicides cross-reacted differently. In method A, the aromatic moiety of 2,4-D was distal from the carrier protein and labeled enzyme, whereas in method B, the acetic acid portion of the herbicide was distal. The use of both methods to screen for this herbicide in ground water and municipal and river water reduced the number of false-positive responses. Water sources having a low background response could be monitored with either method alone. When a concentration step, with disposable C18 extraction columns, was used, the limit of sensitivity was 5 micrograms/L. Method A was the more sensitive of the 2 methods with a limit of detection of 10 micrograms/L without the concentration step.
开发了两种固相酶免疫测定法来测量2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-D),使用了两组结构不同的免疫原和酶配体。2,4-D类似物2-甲基-4-氯苯氧乙酸(MCPA)在两种方法中给出了相似的响应,而其他苯氧基除草剂的交叉反应则有所不同。在方法A中,2,4-D的芳香部分远离载体蛋白和标记酶,而在方法B中,除草剂的乙酸部分远离。使用这两种方法在地下水、市政水和河水中筛选这种除草剂减少了假阳性响应的数量。背景响应较低的水源可以单独用任何一种方法进行监测。当使用一次性C18萃取柱进行浓缩步骤时,灵敏度极限为5微克/升。方法A是两种方法中更灵敏的,在不进行浓缩步骤时检测限为10微克/升。