Suppr超能文献

化疗后症状管理的序贯多项分配随机试验。

A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial of Symptom Management After Chemotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry (A.S.), College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Community and Systems Health Science Division, Department of Psychiatry and Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health (T.B.), College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jun;65(6):541-552.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Many cancer survivors experience a lingering symptom burden after chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

In this sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, we tested optimal sequencing of two evidence-based interventions for symptom management.

METHODS

Survivors of solid tumors (N = 451) were interviewed at baseline and stratified as high or low need for symptom management based on comorbidity and depressive symptoms. High need survivors were randomized initially to the 12-week Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH, N = 282) or 12-week SMSH with eight weeks of Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC, N = 93) added during weeks one to eight. After four weeks of the SMSH alone, non-responders on depression were re-randomized to continue with SMSH alone (N = 30) or add TIPC (N = 31). Severity of depression and summed severity index of 17 other symptoms over weeks one to13 were compared between randomized groups and among three dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs): 1) SMSH for 12 weeks; 2) SMSH for 12 weeks with eight weeks of TIPC from week one; 3) SMSH for four weeks followed by SMSH+TIPC for eight weeks if no response to the SMSH alone on depression at week four.

RESULTS

There were no main effects for randomized arms or DTRs, but there was a significant interaction of trial arm with baseline depression favoring SMSH alone during weeks one to four in the first randomization and SMSH+TIPC in the second randomization.

CONCLUSION

The SMSH may represent a simple effective option for symptom management, adding TIPC only when there is no response to SMSH alone for people with elevated depression and multiple co-morbidities.

摘要

背景

许多癌症幸存者在化疗后仍有挥之不去的症状负担。

目的

在这项序贯多项分配随机试验中,我们测试了两种基于证据的症状管理干预措施的最佳顺序。

方法

对 451 名实体瘤幸存者进行基线访谈,并根据合并症和抑郁症状将其分为高或低症状管理需求。高需求幸存者最初随机分为 12 周症状管理和生存手册(SMSH,N=282)或 12 周 SMSH 加 1 至 8 周的电话人际咨询(TIPC,N=93)。在单独使用 SMSH 四周后,对抑郁反应不佳的非应答者重新随机分配继续单独使用 SMSH(N=30)或添加 TIPC(N=31)。在第 1 周到第 13 周期间,比较了随机分组之间以及三种动态治疗方案(DTRs)之间抑郁严重程度和 17 种其他症状的总严重程度指数:1)SMSH 治疗 12 周;2)SMSH 治疗 12 周,第 1 周开始添加 8 周 TIPC;3)SMSH 治疗 4 周,如果在第 4 周对单独使用 SMSH 治疗抑郁无反应,则 SMSH+TIPC 治疗 8 周。

结果

随机分组或 DTRs 均无主要影响,但在试验分组与基线抑郁之间存在显著交互作用,有利于在第一次随机分组的前四周单独使用 SMSH,而在第二次随机分组中则单独使用 SMSH+TIPC。

结论

SMSH 可能是一种简单有效的症状管理选择,仅在对单独使用 SMSH 无反应的情况下对抑郁和多种合并症患者添加 TIPC。

相似文献

1
A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial of Symptom Management After Chemotherapy.化疗后症状管理的序贯多项分配随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jun;65(6):541-552.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
6
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验