Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Measurement Science Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA; Health Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Chest. 2023 Aug;164(2):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
Two antifibrotic medications, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Little is known about their real-world adoption.
What are the real-world antifibrotic utilization rates and factors associated with uptake among a national cohort of veterans with IPF?
This study identified veterans with IPF who received care either provided by the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System or non-VA care paid for by the VA. Patients who had filled at least one antifibrotic prescription through the VA pharmacy or Medicare Part D between October 15, 2014, and December 31, 2019, were identified. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with antifibrotic uptake, accounting for comorbidities, facility clustering, and follow-up time. Fine-Gray models were used to evaluate antifibrotic use by demographic factors, accounting for the competing risk of death.
Among 14,792 veterans with IPF, 17% received antifibrotics. There were significant disparities in adoption, with lower uptake associated with female sex (adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.63; P < .001), Black race (adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.73; P < .001), and rural residence (adjusted OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97; P = .012). Veterans who received their index diagnosis of IPF outside the VA were less likely to receive antifibrotic therapy (adjusted OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10-0.22; P < .001).
This study is the first to evaluate the real-world adoption of antifibrotic medications among veterans with IPF. Overall uptake was low, and there were significant disparities in use. Interventions to address these issues deserve further investigation.
两种抗纤维化药物吡非尼酮和尼达尼布已获准用于治疗特发性肺纤维化(IPF)。关于它们在真实世界中的应用知之甚少。
在全国退伍军人特发性肺纤维化队列中,真实世界中抗纤维化药物的使用率是多少?与接受治疗相关的因素有哪些?
本研究确定了在退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统中接受治疗或由 VA 支付的非 VA 护理的 IPF 退伍军人。在 2014 年 10 月 15 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间,通过 VA 药房或 Medicare 部分 D 至少开了一种抗纤维化处方的患者。使用分层逻辑回归模型来检查与抗纤维化药物使用相关的因素,同时考虑合并症、设施聚类和随访时间。使用 Fine-Gray 模型根据人口统计学因素评估抗纤维化药物的使用情况,同时考虑死亡的竞争风险。
在 14792 名特发性肺纤维化退伍军人中,有 17%的人接受了抗纤维化治疗。接受治疗的比例存在显著差异,女性(调整后的 OR,0.41;95%CI,0.27-0.63;P<0.001)、黑人(调整后的 OR,0.60;95%CI,0.49-0.73;P<0.001)和农村居民(调整后的 OR,0.88;95%CI,0.80-0.97;P=0.012)的接受率较低。在 VA 以外获得特发性肺纤维化指数诊断的退伍军人接受抗纤维化治疗的可能性较低(调整后的 OR,0.15;95%CI,0.10-0.22;P<0.001)。
本研究首次评估了退伍军人特发性肺纤维化患者真实世界中抗纤维化药物的使用情况。总体使用率较低,且使用存在显著差异。需要进一步研究解决这些问题的干预措施。