The Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun 1;24(6):e282-e291. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003218. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
Provider-only, combined surgical, and medical multidisciplinary rounds ("surgical rounds") are essential to achieve optimal outcomes in large pediatric cardiac ICUs. Lean methodology was applied with the aims of identifying areas of waste and nonvalue-added work within the surgical rounds process. Thereby, the goals were to improve rounding efficiency and reduce rounding duration while not sacrificing critical patient care discussion nor delaying bedside rounds or surgical start times.
Single-center improvement science study with observational and interventional phases from February 2, 2021, to July 31, 2021.
Tertiary pediatric cardiac ICU.
Cardiothoracic surgery and cardiac intensive care team members participating in daily "surgical" rounds.
Implementation of technology automation, creation of work instructions, standardization of patient presentation content and order, provider training, and novel role assignment.
Sixty-one multidisciplinary rounds were observed (30 pre, 31 postintervention). During the preintervention period, identified inefficiencies included prolonged preparation time, redundant work, presentation variability and extraneous information, and frequent provider transitions. Application of targeted interventions resulted in a 26% decrease in indexed rounds duration (2.42 vs 1.8 min; p = 0.0003), 50% decrease in indexed rounds preparation time (0.53 vs 0.27 min; p < 0.0001), and 66% decrease in transition time between patients (0.09 vs 0.03 min; p < 0.0001). The number of presenting provider changes also decreased (9 vs 4; p < 0.0001). Indexed discussion duration did not change (1 vs 0.98 min; p = 0.08) nor did balancing measures (bedside rounds and surgical start times) change (8.5 vs 9 min; p = 0.89 and 38 vs 22 min; p = 0.09).
Lean methodology can be effectively applied to multidisciplinary rounds in a joint cardiothoracic surgery/cardiac intensive care setting to decrease waste and inefficiency. Interventions resulted in decreased preparation time, transition time, presenting provider changes, total rounds duration indexed to patient census, and anecdotal improvements in provider satisfaction.
在大型儿科心脏 ICU 中,仅由医疗服务提供者、联合外科和多学科联合查房(“外科查房”)是实现最佳结果的关键。本研究采用精益方法,旨在确定外科查房流程中的浪费和非增值工作领域。目标是提高查房效率并缩短查房时间,同时不影响关键的患者护理讨论,也不延迟床边查房或手术开始时间。
这是一项单中心的改进科学研究,于 2021 年 2 月 2 日至 7 月 31 日期间进行了观察性和干预性阶段。
三级儿科心脏 ICU。
参与日常“外科”查房的心胸外科医生和心脏重症监护团队成员。
实施技术自动化、创建工作说明、标准化患者介绍内容和顺序、提供培训以及新的角色分配。
观察了 61 次多学科查房(干预前 30 次,干预后 31 次)。在干预前阶段,发现的效率低下包括准备时间延长、冗余工作、介绍内容和信息的可变性以及频繁的提供者转换。应用有针对性的干预措施使索引查房时间减少了 26%(2.42 分钟与 1.8 分钟;p = 0.0003),准备时间减少了 50%(0.53 分钟与 0.27 分钟;p < 0.0001),患者之间的转换时间减少了 66%(0.09 分钟与 0.03 分钟;p < 0.0001)。参与介绍的提供者数量也减少了(9 人与 4 人;p < 0.0001)。索引讨论时间没有变化(1 分钟与 0.98 分钟;p = 0.08),平衡措施(床边查房和手术开始时间)也没有变化(8.5 分钟与 9 分钟;p = 0.89 和 38 分钟与 22 分钟;p = 0.09)。
精益方法可有效地应用于联合心胸外科/心脏重症监护病房的多学科查房,以减少浪费和效率低下。干预措施减少了准备时间、转换时间、介绍提供者的变化、以患者人数为指标的总查房时间,以及提供者满意度的提高。