School of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China.
National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jun;109:104959. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.104959. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
This study investigated multimorbidity patterns among middle-aged and older Chinese people and whether healthcare costs varied among different multimorbidity patterns.
Data were from the 2011-2018 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). We included 20,855 unique observations with information coming from their last wave of interviews and aged at least 45 years or older. Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to classify individuals with common multimorbidity clusters based on 14 self-reported chronic diseases. Healthcare costs were from participants' self-reports and categorized into outpatient, inpatient, and self-treatment. Two-part regression was performed to analyze the association of multimorbidity patterns with healthcare costs.
Five multimorbidity clusters were identified: minimal disease, arthritis, cardiovascular disease (CVD), lung/asthma, and multisystem morbidity. The multisystem morbidity group had the highest use in all three types of healthcare and the highest self-treatment cost. Compared with the minimal disease group, the other four groups did not show significant differences in outpatient costs. Relative to the minimal disease group, the lung/asthma group reported lower inpatient costs.
Healthcare use and costs varied across multimorbidity patterns among middle-aged and older Chinese people. Implementing an integrated care plan for multimorbidity is suggested to improve the cost-effectiveness of healthcare provision and reduce the financial burden of the healthcare system. Reimbursement policy design should also take multimorbidity patterns into account.
本研究调查了中年和老年中国人的多种疾病模式,以及不同的多种疾病模式是否存在医疗费用差异。
数据来自中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)2011-2018 年的各轮调查。我们共纳入了 20855 个独特的观察值,这些观察值来自他们最后一轮访谈的信息,且年龄至少为 45 岁或以上。采用潜在类别分析(LCA)根据 14 种自我报告的慢性疾病对具有常见多种疾病群的个体进行分类。医疗费用来自参与者的自我报告,并分为门诊、住院和自我治疗。采用双部分回归分析多种疾病模式与医疗费用之间的关系。
确定了五种多种疾病模式:最小疾病、关节炎、心血管疾病(CVD)、肺部/哮喘和多系统疾病。多系统疾病组在所有三种医疗服务的使用上均最高,自我治疗费用也最高。与最小疾病组相比,其他四组的门诊费用没有显著差异。与最小疾病组相比,肺部/哮喘组的住院费用较低。
中年和老年中国人的多种疾病模式存在医疗服务使用和费用的差异。建议为多种疾病实施综合护理计划,以提高医疗服务提供的成本效益,并减轻医疗体系的经济负担。报销政策的设计也应考虑多种疾病模式。