• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧预防性乳房切除术:我们是否应该保留胸大肌筋膜?一项荷兰双盲、前瞻性、随机对照试点研究(PROFAS)的方案,采用自身对照设计。

Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: should we preserve the pectoral fascia? Protocol of a Dutch double blinded, prospective, randomised controlled pilot study with a within-subject design (PROFAS).

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e066728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066728.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066728
PMID:36806067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9944307/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer has shown to provide the greatest risk reduction. Many surgical guidelines recommend the removal of the pectoral fascia (PF) in mastectomies; however, there is no evidence to support this statement. Reported wound-related complications following mastectomy include seroma, flap necrosis, infection and haematoma. Seroma causes discomfort and may delay the reconstructive procedures. Whether removal or preservation of the PF influences drain volume, seroma formation and other postoperative complications following BPM remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of removal versus preservation of the PF on drain policy and seroma after BPM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a double blinded, prospective, randomised controlled pilot study with a within-subject design. The inclusion criteria are women >18 years, presenting in the Academic Breast Cancer Centre Rotterdam, who are opting for BPM. Patients with a history or diagnosis of breast cancer are excluded. According to the sample size calculation based on the difference in total drain volume, a number of 21 eligible patients will be included. Randomisation will occur within the patient, which means PF preservation in one breast and PF removal in the contralateral breast. The primary study endpoint is total drainage volume. Secondary study outcomes include time to drain removal, number of needle aspirations, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the Erasmus Medical Center Review Board (REC 2020-0431). Results will be presented during international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed academic journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05391763; clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

简介

双侧预防性乳房切除术(BPM)在罹患乳腺癌风险较高的女性中已被证明能提供最大的风险降低。许多外科手术指南建议在乳房切除术中切除胸大肌筋膜(PF);然而,目前尚无证据支持这一说法。乳房切除术后报告的与伤口相关的并发症包括血清肿、皮瓣坏死、感染和血肿。血清肿会引起不适,并可能延迟重建手术。BPM 后 PF 的切除或保留是否会影响引流管的体积、血清肿的形成和其他术后并发症仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估 PF 的切除与保留对 BPM 后引流管政策和血清肿的影响。

方法和分析

这是一项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照的初步研究,采用自身对照设计。纳入标准为年龄>18 岁、在鹿特丹学术乳腺癌中心就诊、选择 BPM 的女性。有乳腺癌病史或诊断的患者被排除在外。根据基于总引流管体积差异的样本量计算,将纳入 21 名符合条件的患者。将在患者内部进行随机分组,这意味着一侧乳房保留 PF,另一侧乳房切除 PF。主要研究终点是总引流管体积。次要研究结果包括引流管去除时间、抽吸针数、术后并发症和住院时间。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得伊拉斯谟医学中心审查委员会(REC 2020-0431)的批准。结果将在国际会议上展示,并发表在同行评议的学术期刊上。

试验注册号

NCT05391763;clinicaltrials.gov。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0808/9944307/3b16ea0c7233/bmjopen-2022-066728f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0808/9944307/3b16ea0c7233/bmjopen-2022-066728f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0808/9944307/3b16ea0c7233/bmjopen-2022-066728f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: should we preserve the pectoral fascia? Protocol of a Dutch double blinded, prospective, randomised controlled pilot study with a within-subject design (PROFAS).双侧预防性乳房切除术:我们是否应该保留胸大肌筋膜?一项荷兰双盲、前瞻性、随机对照试点研究(PROFAS)的方案,采用自身对照设计。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e066728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066728.
2
Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.乳腺癌乳房切除术后采用缝合法封闭死腔与传统引流法封闭预防血清肿(QUISERMAS):一项多中心随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e009903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009903.
3
A randomised study of axillary drainage and pectoral fascia preservation after mastectomy for breast cancer.乳腺癌乳房切除术后腋窝引流与胸肌筋膜保留的随机研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Aug;30(6):602-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.020.
4
A single-center, randomized, non-inferiority study evaluating seroma formation after mastectomy combined with flap fixation with or without suction drainage: protocol for the Seroma reduction and drAin fRee mAstectomy (SARA) trial.一项单中心、随机、非劣效性研究,评估了乳房切除术联合皮瓣固定加或不加吸引引流后血清肿的形成:血清肿减少和无引流乳房切除术(SARA)试验方案。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 7;20(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07242-0.
5
A multi-center, double blind randomized controlled trial evaluating flap fixation after mastectomy using sutures or tissue glue versus conventional closure: protocol for the Seroma reduction After Mastectomy (SAM) trial.一项多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验,评估使用缝线或组织胶固定乳房切除术后皮瓣与传统缝合关闭的效果:乳房切除术(SAM)后减少血清肿的研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4740-8.
6
Flap Fixation Using Tissue Glue or Sutures Appears to Reduce Seroma Aspiration After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer.使用组织胶水或缝线固定皮瓣似乎可减少乳腺癌乳房切除术后的血清肿抽吸。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Jul;17(4):316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
Whether drainage should be used after surgery for breast cancer? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.乳腺癌手术后是否应该引流?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Med Oncol. 2011 Dec;28 Suppl 1:S22-30. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9673-2. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
8
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.
9
Reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy by closure of the dead space: The interim analysis of a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial (SAM trial).减少乳腺癌根治术后皮下积液及其并发症的研究:多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验(SAM 试验)的中期分析。
Breast. 2019 Aug;46:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 7.
10
Drain-free mastectomy and flap fixation: The interim analysis of a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.免引流乳房切除术及皮瓣固定术:一项随机对照非劣效性试验的中期分析
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;129(5):975-980. doi: 10.1002/jso.27577. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A multidisciplinary view of mastectomy and breast reconstruction: Understanding the challenges.乳房切除术和乳房重建的多学科观点:了解挑战。
Breast. 2021 Apr;56:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Spatial location of local recurrences after mastectomy: a systematic review.乳房切除术后局部复发的空间位置:系统评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Sep;183(2):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05774-4. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Pectoral Fascia Preservation in Oncological Mastectomy to Reduce Complications and Improve Reconstructions: A Systematic Review.
肿瘤性乳房切除术中保留胸肌筋膜以减少并发症并改善乳房重建:一项系统综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2700. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002700. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures may optimize shared decision-making for cancer risk management in BRCA mutation carriers.患者报告结局测量指标可优化 BRCA 基因突变携带者的癌症风险管理中的共享决策。
Breast Cancer. 2020 May;27(3):426-434. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-01033-7. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
5
Survival after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者行双侧降低风险乳房切除术的生存情况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Oct;177(3):723-733. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05345-2. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
6
International trends in the uptake of cancer risk reduction strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.具有 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变的女性中采用癌症风险降低策略的国际趋势。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(1):15-21. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0446-1. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
The Lack of Consensus of International Contouring Guidelines for the Dorsal Border of the Chest Wall Clinical Target Volume: What is the Impact on Organs at Risk and Relationships to Patterns of Recurrence in the Modern Era?胸壁临床靶区背侧边界国际轮廓勾画指南缺乏共识:对现代有风险器官及复发模式关系有何影响?
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 27;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.008. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
8
Trends in use of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy vs high-risk surveillance in unaffected carriers of inherited breast cancer syndromes in the Inherited Cancer Registry (ICARE).遗传性癌症登记处(ICARE)中遗传性乳腺癌综合征未受影响携带者中双侧预防性乳房切除术与高危监测的使用趋势。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;174(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5057-7. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
9
The evolution of mastectomy surgical technique: from mutilation to medicine.乳房切除术手术技术的演变:从残害到医学。
Gland Surg. 2018 Jun;7(3):308-315. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.09.07.
10
Substantial breast cancer risk reduction and potential survival benefit after bilateral mastectomy when compared with surveillance in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective analysis.与健康 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变携带者的监测相比,双侧乳房切除术可显著降低乳腺癌风险并可能带来生存获益:一项前瞻性分析。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Aug;24(8):2029-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt134. Epub 2013 Apr 10.