Suppr超能文献

农村与城市美国医院心力衰竭住院患者的护理质量和结局:Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 注册研究。

Quality of Care and Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure in Rural vs Urban US Hospitals: The Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Apr 1;8(4):376-385. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0241.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Prior studies have suggested patients with heart failure (HF) from rural areas have worse clinical outcomes. Contemporary differences between rural and urban hospitals in quality of care and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized for HF remain poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess quality of care and clinical outcomes for US patients hospitalized for HF at rural vs urban hospitals.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 774 419 patients hospitalized for HF across 569 sites in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2021. Postdischarge outcomes were assessed in a subset of 161 996 patients linked to Medicare claims. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to January 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

GWTG-HF quality measures, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and 30-day mortality and readmission outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 19 832 patients (2.6%) and 754 587 patients (97.4%) hospitalized at 49 rural hospitals (8.6%) and 520 urban hospitals (91.4%), respectively. Of 774 419 included patients, 366 161 (47.3%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 73 (62-83) years. Compared with patients at urban hospitals, patients at rural hospitals were older (median [IQR] age, 74 [64-84] years vs 73 [61-83] years; standardized difference, 10.63) and more likely to be non-Hispanic White (14 572 [73.5%] vs 498 950 [66.1%]; standardized difference, 34.47). In adjusted models, patients at rural hospitals were less likely to be prescribed cardiac resynchronization therapy (adjusted risk difference [aRD], -13.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.92), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (aRD, -3.7%; aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96), and an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (aRD, -5.0%; aOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98) at discharge. In-hospital mortality was similar between rural and urban hospitals (460 of 19 832 [2.3%] vs 20 529 of 754 587 [2.7%]; aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07). Patients at rural hospitals were less likely to have a length of stay of 4 or more days (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.85). Among Medicare beneficiaries, there were no significant differences between rural and urban hospitals in 30-day HF readmission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90-1.19), all-cause readmission (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.04), and all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this large contemporary cohort of US patients hospitalized for HF, care at rural hospitals was independently associated with lower use of some guideline-recommended therapies at discharge and shorter length of stay. In-hospital mortality and 30-day postdischarge outcomes were similar at rural and urban hospitals.

摘要

重要性

先前的研究表明,来自农村地区的心力衰竭(HF)患者的临床结局更差。农村和城市医院在心力衰竭患者住院期间的护理质量和临床结局方面的当代差异仍知之甚少。

目的

评估美国农村和城市医院 HF 住院患者的护理质量和临床结局。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究分析了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间,在 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure(GWTG-HF)注册中心的 569 个地点住院治疗 HF 的 774419 名患者。在与医疗保险索赔相关的 161996 名患者的子集中评估了出院后结局。数据于 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月进行分析。

主要结局和测量

GWTG-HF 质量指标、住院死亡率、住院时间和 30 天死亡率和再入院结局。

结果

这项研究包括 19832 名(2.6%)和 754587 名(97.4%)分别在 49 家农村医院(8.6%)和 520 家城市医院(91.4%)住院的患者。在 774419 名纳入患者中,366161 名(47.3%)为女性,中位数(IQR)年龄为 73(62-83)岁。与城市医院的患者相比,农村医院的患者年龄更大(中位数[IQR]年龄,74 [64-84] 岁比 73 [61-83] 岁;标准化差异,10.63),非西班牙裔白人的比例更高(14572 [73.5%] 比 498950 [66.1%];标准化差异,34.47)。在调整模型中,农村医院的患者更不可能接受心脏再同步治疗(调整风险差异[aRD],-13.5%;调整优势比[aOR],0.44;95%CI,0.22-0.92)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(aRD,-3.7%;aOR,0.71;95%CI,0.53-0.96)和血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(aRD,-5.0%;aOR,0.68;95%CI,0.47-0.98)。农村和城市医院的住院死亡率相似(19832 名中的 460 名[2.3%] 与 754587 名中的 20529 名[2.7%];aOR,0.86;95%CI,0.70-1.07)。农村医院的患者住院时间为 4 天或更长时间的可能性较低(aOR,0.75;95%CI,0.67-0.85)。在医疗保险受益人中,农村和城市医院在 30 天 HF 再入院(调整危险比[aHR],1.03;95%CI,0.90-1.19)、全因再入院(aHR,0.97;95%CI,0.91-1.04)和全因死亡率(aHR,1.05;95%CI,0.91-1.21)方面无显著差异。

结论和相关性

在这项针对美国 HF 住院患者的大型当代队列研究中,农村医院的护理与出院时某些指南推荐疗法的使用率较低和住院时间较短独立相关。农村和城市医院的住院死亡率和 30 天出院后结局相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验