Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Group, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Jun;86:111072. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111072. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
To investigate if an erector spinae plane (ESP) block decreases postoperative opioid consumption, pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS).
A single-center, double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Postoperative period; operating room, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital ward in a university hospital.
Seventy-two patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic MIMVS via right-sided mini-thoracotomy and enrolled in the institutional enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery program.
At the end of surgery, all patients received an ESP catheter at vertebra T5 under ultrasound guidance and were randomized to the administration of either ropivacaine 0.5% (loading of dose 30 ml and three additional doses of 20 ml with a 6 h interval) or normal saline 0.9% (with an identical administration scheme). In addition, patients received multimodal postoperative analgesia including dexamethasone, acetaminophen and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine. Following the final ESP bolus and before catheter removal, the position of the catheter was re-evaluated by ultrasound. Patients, investigators and medical personnel were blinded for the group allocation during the entire trial.
Primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption during the first 24 h after extubation. Secondary outcomes included severity of pain, presence/extent of sensory block, duration of postoperative ventilation and hospital length of stay. Safety outcomes comprised the incidence of adverse events.
Median (IQR) 24-h morphine consumption was not different between the intervention- and control-group, 41 mg (30-55) versus 37 mg (29-50) (p = 0.70), respectively. Likewise, no differences were detected for secondary and safety endpoints.
Following MIMVS, adding an ESP block to a standard multimodal analgesia regimen did not reduce opioid consumption and pain scores.
探讨在微创二尖瓣手术(MIMVS)中,竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞是否可以减少术后阿片类药物的消耗、疼痛和术后恶心呕吐。
单中心、双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
术后;在大学医院的手术室、麻醉后监护病房(PACU)和病房。
72 例行右侧小切口电视辅助胸腔镜 MIMVS 并纳入机构心脏手术后强化康复计划的患者。
手术结束时,所有患者均在超声引导下于 T5 椎旁置入 ESP 导管,并随机分为罗哌卡因 0.5%(负荷剂量 30ml,之后每 6 小时追加 3 次 20ml)或生理盐水 0.9%(相同给药方案)组。此外,患者接受多模式术后镇痛,包括地塞米松、对乙酰氨基酚和吗啡患者自控静脉镇痛。ESP 推注结束后且在导管拔除前,通过超声再次评估导管位置。在整个试验过程中,患者、研究者和医务人员对分组情况均不知情。
主要结局是拔管后 24 小时内吗啡的累积消耗量。次要结局包括疼痛严重程度、感觉阻滞的存在/程度、术后通气时间和住院时间。安全性结局包括不良事件的发生率。
干预组和对照组 24 小时吗啡消耗量中位数(IQR)分别为 41mg(30-55)和 37mg(29-50),差异无统计学意义(p=0.70)。同样,次要结局和安全性结局也无差异。
在 MIMVS 后,在标准多模式镇痛方案中加入 ESP 阻滞并不能减少阿片类药物的消耗和疼痛评分。