Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Acad Radiol. 2023 Sep;30(9):2050-2058. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
An annual survey of chief residents in accredited North American radiology programs is conducted by the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (ACR). Special topics surveyed for the 2021-2022 academic year were procedural competency and virtual radiology education in the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to summarize the 2021-2022 ACR chief resident survey.
An online survey was distributed to chief residents from 197 Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited radiology residency programs. Chief residents responded to questions regarding their individual procedural readiness and attitudes on virtual radiology education. A single chief resident from each residency answered programmatic questions including the use of virtual education, faculty coverage, and fellowship choices among their graduating classes.
We received 110 individual responses from 61 programs, yielding a 31% program response rate. Although the majority (80%) of programs maintained purely in-person attending readout throughout the COVID 19 pandemic, only 13% of programs reported purely in-person didactics and 26% converted to all virtual didactics. The majority (53%-74%) of chief residents perceived virtual learning (in read-out, case conference, and didactic formats) to be less effective than in-person learning. One third of chief residents reported decreased procedural exposure during the pandemic, and 7%-9% of chief residents felt uncomfortable with basic procedures (basic fluoroscopy examinations, basic aspiration/drainage procedures, and superficial biopsy procedures). The number of programs with 24/7 attending coverage increased from 35% in 2019 to 49% in 2022. Body, neuroradiology, and interventional radiology were the most popular advanced training options among graduating radiology residents.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on radiology training, particularly in terms of virtual learning. These survey results suggest that although digital learning offers increased flexibility, most residents still prefer in-person readout and didactics. Despite this, virtual learning will likely remain a viable option as programs continue to evolve following the pandemic.
北美放射学专业认证项目的住院总医师每年都会接受美国放射学学术住院总医师联盟(ACR)的年度调查。2021-2022 学年调查的专题包括程序能力和 COVID-19 大流行期间的虚拟放射学教育。本研究旨在总结 2021-2022 年 ACR 住院总医师调查。
向来自 197 个经研究生医学教育认证委员会认证的放射学住院医师培训项目的住院总医师在线发放调查。住院总医师回答了有关个人程序准备情况以及对虚拟放射学教育的态度的问题。每个住院医师培训项目仅由一名住院总医师回答,包括使用虚拟教育、师资覆盖范围以及他们毕业班级中的奖学金选择等项目问题。
我们从 61 个项目中收到了 110 名住院总医师的个人回复,项目回复率为 31%。尽管大多数(80%)项目在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间都保持完全面对面的读片,但只有 13%的项目报告完全是面对面的教学,26%的项目转换为全虚拟教学。大多数(53%-74%)住院总医师认为虚拟学习(读片、病例讨论和教学形式)不如面对面学习有效。三分之一的住院总医师报告在大流行期间程序曝光度降低,7%-9%的住院总医师对基本程序(基本透视检查、基本抽吸/引流程序和浅表活检程序)感到不舒服。24/7 有主治医生值班的项目数量从 2019 年的 35%增加到 2022 年的 49%。身体、神经放射学和介入放射学是放射科住院医师最受欢迎的高级培训选择。
COVID-19 大流行对放射科培训产生了深远的影响,特别是在虚拟学习方面。这些调查结果表明,尽管数字学习提供了更大的灵活性,但大多数住院医师仍更喜欢面对面的读片和教学。尽管如此,随着项目在大流行后继续发展,虚拟学习可能仍然是一种可行的选择。