To the Editor: For Equity in Assessment: A Comment on Bias in the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.
作者信息
Calles Ignacio
机构信息
Clinical Instructor of Emergency Medicine (Fellow), University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine.
出版信息
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Feb;15(1):129. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00899.1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
To the Editor: For Equity in Assessment: A Comment on Bias in the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.致编辑：为了评估中的公平性：对急诊医学标准化评估信中偏见的评论
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Feb;15(1):129. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00899.1.
2
Characteristics of the emergency medicine standardized letter of recommendation.
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Apr;7(4):409-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02253.x.
3
Choosing the Right Resident: Implications of the New Electronic Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.选择合适的住院医师：新型电子急诊医学标准化评估信的影响
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):187-188. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00163.1.
4
Correspondence (letter to the editor): pay attention to the target group.读者来信（致编辑的信）：关注目标群体。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Apr;107(17):303; author reply 304-5. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0303b. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
5
Racial Bias on the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信函中的种族偏见。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):542-548. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01144.1.
6
A standardized letter of recommendation for residency application.一份用于住院医师申请的标准化推荐信。
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Nov;6(11):1141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00117.x.
7
Does the experience of the writer affect the evaluative components on the standardized letter of recommendation in emergency medicine?作者的经验是否会影响急诊医学标准化推荐信中的评估内容？
J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):544-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.025. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Evaluation of clinical performances of emergency medicine residents using standardized patients.使用标准化患者评估急诊医学住院医师的临床能力。
Acad Med. 1999 Feb;74(2):202. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199902000-00021.
9
Diversity and inclusion among U.S. emergency medicine residency programs and practicing physicians: Towards equity in workforce.美国急诊医学住院医师培训项目及执业医师中的多样性与包容性：迈向劳动力公平
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:690-692. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.055. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
10
Inaccuracy of the global assessment score in the emergency medicine standard letter of recommendation.全球评估评分在急诊医学标准推荐信中的不准确性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17 Suppl 2:S38-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00882.x.
本文引用的文献
1
Ethnic and Racial Differences in Ratings in the Medical Student Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOE).医学生标准化推荐信（SLOE）中的评价存在种族差异。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):549-553. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01174.1.
2
Racial Bias on the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信函中的种族偏见。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):542-548. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01144.1.
3
Validity Evidence for the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信的有效性证据。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Aug;13(4):490-499. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01110.1. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Multi-institutional Implementation of the National Clinical Assessment Tool in Emergency Medicine: Data From the First Year of Use.国家临床评估工具在急诊医学中的多机构实施：第一年使用数据
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Jul 20;5(2):e10496. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10496. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
The Emergency Medicine Group Standardized Letter of Evaluation as a Workplace-based Assessment: The Validity Is in the Detail.急诊医学组标准化评估信作为一种基于工作场所的评估：细节决定有效性。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 21;21(3):600-609. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45077.
Zotero 插件