Safonova Inna, Perfilova Alina
LabEPOM, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Igneous Petrology Lab, Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Natl Sci Rev. 2022 Oct 11;10(2):nwac215. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac215. eCollection 2023 Feb.
This paper reviews published and presents new data on U-Pb detrital zircon ages, and petrographic, geochemical and isotope (Sm-Nd, Lu-Hf) compositions obtained from greywacke sandstones of Kazakhstan in order to reconstruct fossil intra-oceanic arcs that once existed at Pacific-type convergent margins of the Paleo-Asian Ocean (PAO) in Paleozoic time. We focus on orogenic belts of central Kazakhstan (Itmurundy and Tekturmas) and eastern Kazakhstan (Zharma and Char) in the western Central Asian Orogenic belt. These orogenic belts host accretionary complexes with greywacke sandstones of early Paleozoic (central Kazakhstan) and middle-late Paleozoic (eastern Kazakhstan) ages. First, we evaluate general perspectives for studying sandstones to reconstruct survived and disappeared magmatic arcs, taking into account episodes of subduction erosion. Then we discuss the analytical data from sandstones to make conclusions about the ages and formation settings of their igneous protoliths and define maximum deposition ages. Finally, we discuss the role of serpentinite mélanges in tectonic reconstructions. We argue that sandstones hosted by accretionary complexes are typically greywackes deposited close to their igneous sources and buried rapidly. The provenances of the studied greywacke sandstones of central and eastern Kazakhstan were dominated by mafic to andesitic igneous protoliths derived from juvenile mantle sources. The igneous rocks in the provenances were emplaced in an intra-oceanic arc setting. The sandstones were deposited in fore-arc/trench basins or, to a lesser degree, in back-arc basins. The data from both sandstones and serpentinite mélanges reconstruct middle-late-Cambrian, Ordovician, late-Devonian and Carboniferous arcs of the western PAO. The middle-late Cambrian arcs were fully destroyed by subduction erosion, whereas the Ordovician and Carboniferous arcs survived. The late-Devonian arcs were also eroded, but partly. Both the early and late Paleozoic active margins of the PAO were characterized by alternating periods of accretionary growth and subduction erosion.
本文回顾了已发表的关于哈萨克斯坦杂砂岩的U-Pb碎屑锆石年龄以及岩石学、地球化学和同位素(Sm-Nd、Lu-Hf)组成的数据,并展示了新的数据,以便重建古生代曾存在于古亚洲洋(PAO)太平洋型汇聚边缘的化石洋内弧。我们重点研究了中亚造山带西部哈萨克斯坦中部(伊特穆伦迪和特克图尔马斯)和哈萨克斯坦东部(扎尔马和恰尔)的造山带。这些造山带包含早古生代(哈萨克斯坦中部)和中晚古生代(哈萨克斯坦东部)年龄的杂砂岩增生杂岩。首先,我们考虑俯冲侵蚀事件,评估研究砂岩以重建现存和消失的岩浆弧的总体视角。然后我们讨论砂岩的分析数据,以得出其火成原岩的年龄和形成环境的结论,并确定最大沉积年龄。最后,我们讨论蛇纹岩混杂岩在构造重建中的作用。我们认为,增生杂岩中的砂岩通常是靠近其火成源沉积并迅速埋藏的杂砂岩。哈萨克斯坦中部和东部所研究的杂砂岩的物源主要是源自新生地幔源的镁铁质到安山质火成原岩。物源中的火成岩侵入于洋内弧环境。砂岩沉积于弧前/海沟盆地,或在较小程度上沉积于弧后盆地。砂岩和蛇纹岩混杂岩的数据重建了古亚洲洋西部寒武纪中晚期、奥陶纪、泥盆纪晚期和石炭纪的弧。寒武纪中晚期的弧被俯冲侵蚀完全破坏,而奥陶纪和石炭纪的弧得以幸存。泥盆纪晚期的弧也受到了侵蚀,但只是部分被侵蚀。古亚洲洋早古生代和晚古生代的活动边缘都以增生生长和俯冲侵蚀交替的时期为特征。