对《认识与检验：一项认识论研究》批评者的回应
Replies to the Critics of Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation.
作者信息
Melchior Guido
机构信息
Department of Philosophy, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 26/5, 8010 Graz, Austria.
出版信息
Acta Anal. 2023;38(1):95-131. doi: 10.1007/s12136-022-00541-0. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
Abstract
This paper replies to the comments made in by Peter Baumann, Kelly Becker, Marian David, Nenad Miščević, Wes Siscoe, and Danilo Šuster on my (Routledge 2019), hereinafter abbreviated as KC. These papers resulted from a workshop organized by the department of philosophy of the University of Maribor. I am very thankful to the organizers of the workshop and to the authors for their comments.
摘要
本文回应彼得·鲍曼、凯利·贝克尔、玛丽安·大卫、内纳德·米舍维奇、韦斯·西斯科和达尼洛·舒斯特在他们对我的《知识的因果理论》（劳特利奇出版社，2019年）（以下简称KC）所发表的评论。这些论文源自马里博尔大学哲学系组织的一次研讨会。我非常感谢研讨会的组织者以及作者们的评论。
相似文献
1
Replies to the Critics of Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation.对《认识与检验：一项认识论研究》批评者的回应
Acta Anal. 2023;38(1):95-131. doi: 10.1007/s12136-022-00541-0. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
2
Précis on Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation.《关于认识与检验的概述：一项认识论研究》
Acta Anal. 2023;38(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12136-022-00540-1. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Commentary: Comments regarding Becker et al. (Analytica Chimica Acta, 835, 2014, 1-18).
Anal Chim Acta. 2017 Jun 15;972:12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.03.042. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
4
5
Replies to my critics.对批评者的回应。
Stud Gen (Berl). 1971 Jul 16;24(6):823-39.
6
Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine.循证医学中的认识论探究。
Cancer Control. 2009 Apr;16(2):158-68. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600208.
7
Replies to critics.对批评者的回应。
Asian J Philos. 2022;1(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s44204-022-00020-8. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
8
A discourse on the nature of dental hygiene knowledge and knowing.关于口腔卫生知识及其认知本质的论述
Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 Feb;7(1):10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00315.x.
9
Philosophy of biology: outline of a transcendental project.生物学哲学：一个先验项目的概述
Acta Biotheor. 2005;53(2):57-75. doi: 10.1007/s10441-005-5350-9.
10
Spirituality and reductionism: three replies.灵性与还原论：三个回应。
Nurs Philos. 2010 Jul;11(3):178-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00439.x.
本文引用的文献
1
A modal theory of discrimination.一种辨别模态理论。
Synthese. 2021;198(11):10661-10684. doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02747-4. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
2
Williamson on Counterpossibles.威廉姆森论反事实条件句
J Philos Logic. 2018;47(4):693-713. doi: 10.1007/s10992-017-9446-x. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
3
Sensitivity has Multiple Heterogeneity Problems: a Reply to Wallbridge.敏感性存在多个异质性问题：对沃尔布里奇的回应。
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2017;45(4):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s11406-017-9873-5. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Zotero 插件