Suppr超能文献

识别患有句法特定语言障碍青少年的不同方法的比较研究

A Comparative Study Across Methods to Identify Adolescents with Syntactic Specific Language Impairment.

作者信息

Jong Hui Ying, Rozaida Abdul Rauf, Abdullah Jafri Malin, Reza Mohammed Faruque, Kuan Garry

机构信息

School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

Department of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Dec;29(6):132-145. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.6.13. Epub 2022 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specific language impairment (SLI) is described as a heterogeneous deficit that causes difficulties in various aspects of language. We performed a comparative study of two methods of language assessment with the primary objective of determining the most effective approach for identifying adolescents with syntactic SLI and typical development (TD) in use.

METHODS

A software-assisted method using E-Prime 2.0 was used to create an experiment. The participants were Malay adolescents aged 13 years old-15 years old. The conventional method was compared with the software-assisted method to assess the participants' comprehension and production performance. Data on reaction time (RT), scoring and no response (NR) were obtained from the adolescents.

RESULTS

Based on the two methods, the findings on the selection of participants for the SLI and TD groups was different. The two methods produced similar results in terms of the selection of TD group and most participants in the syntactic SLI group except for two participants who failed in the conventional method but passed the test in the software-assisted method.

CONCLUSION

The descriptive evaluation of the findings suggested selecting software-assisted method as the alternative source because the provided information was detailed and this information enabled the researcher to identify the SLI group.

摘要

背景

特定语言障碍(SLI)被描述为一种异质性缺陷,会在语言的各个方面造成困难。我们对两种语言评估方法进行了比较研究,主要目的是确定在实际应用中识别患有句法SLI和发育正常(TD)的青少年的最有效方法。

方法

使用E-Prime 2.0软件辅助方法创建实验。参与者为13至15岁的马来青少年。将传统方法与软件辅助方法进行比较,以评估参与者的理解和表达能力。从青少年那里获得了反应时间(RT)、评分和无反应(NR)的数据。

结果

基于这两种方法,SLI组和TD组参与者的选择结果不同。在TD组的选择方面,两种方法产生了相似的结果,并且句法SLI组中的大多数参与者也是如此,除了两名在传统方法中未通过但在软件辅助方法中通过测试的参与者。

结论

对结果的描述性评估建议选择软件辅助方法作为替代来源,因为所提供的信息详细,并且这些信息使研究人员能够识别SLI组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7de2/9910374/6bc3f3c9d8fe/13mjms2906_oaf1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验