Suppr超能文献

宫颈癌高剂量率近距离放射治疗中阴道纱布填塞有无球囊技术的比较:一项交叉随机对照试验。

Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Dhanapalan Rishanthini, Pandjatcharam Jagadesan, Saravanan K, Patil Ninad Harish

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.

Medical Physics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2022 Dec;14(6):551-559. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2022.123975. Epub 2022 Dec 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D, D, D, and D of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D: 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, = 0.01; D: 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, < 0.01; D: 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, < 0.01; D: 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D: 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, = 0.18; D: 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, = 0.56; D: 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, = 0.55; D: 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.

摘要

目的

比较接受高剂量率(HDR)腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT)的子宫颈癌患者使用两种不同阴道填塞技术时直肠和膀胱所接受的剂量。

材料与方法

45例宫颈癌患者在完成盆腔外照射放疗后,随机接受使用串联和环形施源器(瓦里安公司)进行的两个疗程的ICBT。操作采用阴道球囊加纱布填塞或单纯阴道纱布填塞,每个疗程使用其中一种方法。阴道填塞类型的顺序通过计算机生成的区组随机化选择。所有患者的A点处方剂量为8.5 Gy。比较两种阴道填塞技术下直肠和膀胱的体积剂量参数,如D、D、D和D。

结果

患者的平均年龄为51岁。大多数(88%)患者在基线时处于局部晚期癌症(IIB期或更高期)。联合填塞技术下的直肠剂量显著更低(D:7.52 Gy对9.02 Gy, = 0.01;D:6.46 Gy对7.42 Gy, < 0.01;D:5.91 Gy对6.7 Gy, < 0.01;D:5.29 Gy对5.97 Gy, < 0.01)。联合填塞技术下的膀胱剂量更高(D:11.20 Gy对10.76 Gy, = 0.18;D:9.64 Gy对9.32 Gy, = 0.56;D:8.64 Gy对8.36 Gy, = 0.55;D:7.56对7.33 Gy, = 0.55)。

结论

在使用串联和环形施源器进行宫颈癌高剂量率近距离放射治疗时,与标准阴道纱布填塞相比,联合阴道填塞可使直肠辐射剂量在统计学上显著降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f676/9924150/39813070ebfe/JCB-14-49845-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验