Caroselli S, Figliuzzi M, Picchetta L, Cogo F, Zambon P, Pergher I, Girardi L, Patassini C, Poli M, Bakalova D, Cimadomo D, Findikli N, Coban O, Serdarogullari M, Favero F, Bortolato S, Anastasi A, Capodanno F, Gallinelli A, Brancati F, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F M, Jimenez-Almazán J, Blesa-Jarque D, Miravet-Valenciano J, Rubio C, Simòn C, Capalbo A
Reproductive Genetics, Igenomix Italia, Rome, Italy.
JUNO GENETICS, Rome, Italy.
Hum Reprod. 2023 Apr 3;38(4):762-775. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead033.
Can chromosomal abnormalities beyond copy-number aneuploidies (i.e. ploidy level and microdeletions (MDs)) be detected using a preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) platform?
The proposed integrated approach accurately assesses ploidy level and the most common pathogenic microdeletions causative of genomic disorders, expanding the clinical utility of PGT.
Standard methodologies employed in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) identify chromosomal aneuploidies but cannot determine ploidy level nor the presence of recurrent pathogenic MDs responsible for genomic disorders. Transferring embryos carrying these abnormalities can result in miscarriage, molar pregnancy, and intellectual disabilities and developmental delay in offspring. The development of a testing strategy that integrates their assessment can resolve current limitations and add valuable information regarding the genetic constitution of embryos, which is not evaluated in PGT providing new level of clinical utility and valuable knowledge for further understanding of the genomic causes of implantation failure and early pregnancy loss. To the best of our knowledge, MDs have never been studied in preimplantation human embryos up to date.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort analysis including blastocyst biopsies collected between February 2018 and November 2021 at multiple collaborating IVF clinics from prospective parents of European ancestry below the age of 45, using autologous gametes and undergoing ICSI for all oocytes. Ploidy level determination was validated using 164 embryonic samples of known ploidy status (147 diploids, 9 triploids, and 8 haploids). Detection of nine common MD syndromes (-4p=Wolf-Hirschhorn, -8q=Langer-Giedion, -1p=1p36 deletion, -22q=DiGeorge, -5p=Cri-du-Chat, -15q=Prader-Willi/Angelman, -11q=Jacobsen, -17p=Smith-Magenis) was developed and tested using 28 positive controls and 97 negative controls. Later, the methodology was blindly applied in the analysis of: (i) 100 two pronuclei (2PN)-derived blastocysts that were previously defined as uniformly euploid by standard PGT-A; (ii) 99 euploid embryos whose transfer resulted in pregnancy loss.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The methodology is based on targeted next-generation sequencing of selected polymorphisms across the genome and enriched within critical regions of included MD syndromes. Sequencing data (i.e. allelic frequencies) were analyzed by a probabilistic model which estimated the likelihood of ploidy level and MD presence, accounting for both sequencing noise and population genetics patterns (i.e. linkage disequilibrium, LD, correlations) observed in 2504 whole-genome sequencing data from the 1000 Genome Project database. Analysis of phased parental haplotypes obtained by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-array genotyping was performed to confirm the presence of MD.
In the analytical validation phase, this strategy showed extremely high accuracy both in ploidy classification (100%, CI: 98.1-100%) and in the identification of six out of eight MDs (99.2%, CI: 98.5-99.8%). To improve MD detection based on loss of heterozygosity (LOH), common haploblocks were analyzed based on haplotype frequency and LOH occurrence in a reference population, thus developing two further mathematical models. As a result, chr1p36 and chr4p16.3 regions were excluded from MD identification due to their poor reliability, whilst a clinical workflow which incorporated parental DNA information was developed to enhance the identification of MDs. During the clinical application phase, one case of triploidy was detected among 2PN-derived blastocysts (i) and one pathogenic MD (-22q11.21) was retrospectively identified among the biopsy specimens of transferred embryos that resulted in miscarriage (ii). For the latter case, family-based analysis revealed the same MD in different sibling embryos (n = 2/5) from non-carrier parents, suggesting the presence of germline mosaicism in the female partner. When embryos are selected for transfer based on their genetic constitution, this strategy can identify embryos with ploidy abnormalities and/or MDs beyond aneuploidies, with an estimated incidence of 1.5% (n = 3/202, 95% CI: 0.5-4.5%) among euploid embryos.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Epidemiological studies will be required to accurately assess the incidence of ploidy alterations and MDs in preimplantation embryos and particularly in euploid miscarriages. Despite the high accuracy of the assay developed, the use of parental DNA to support diagnostic calling can further increase the precision of the assay.
This novel assay significantly expands the clinical utility of PGT-A by integrating the most common pathogenic MDs (both de novo and inherited ones) responsible for genomic disorders, which are usually evaluated at a later stage through invasive prenatal testing. From a basic research standpoint, this approach will help to elucidate fundamental biological and clinical questions related to the genetics of implantation failure and pregnancy loss of otherwise euploid embryos.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. S.C., M.F., F.C., P.Z., I.P., L.G., C.P., M.P., D.B., J.J.-A., D.B.-J., J.M.-V., and C.R. are employees of Igenomix and C.S. is the head of the scientific board of Igenomix. A.C. and L.P. are employees of JUNO GENETICS. Igenomix and JUNO GENETICS are companies providing reproductive genetic services.
N/A.
能否使用植入前基因检测(PGT)平台检测除拷贝数非整倍体(即倍性水平和微缺失(MDs))之外的染色体异常?
所提出的综合方法能够准确评估倍性水平以及导致基因组疾病的最常见致病性微缺失,扩展了PGT的临床应用。
用于非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)的标准方法可识别染色体非整倍体,但无法确定倍性水平,也无法检测导致基因组疾病的复发性致病性MDs。移植携带这些异常的胚胎可能会导致流产、葡萄胎妊娠以及后代智力残疾和发育迟缓。开发一种整合这些评估的检测策略可以解决当前的局限性,并提供有关胚胎基因构成的有价值信息,而PGT并未评估这些信息,这为进一步理解植入失败和早期妊娠丢失的基因组原因提供了新的临床应用水平和有价值的知识。据我们所知,MDs此前从未在植入前人类胚胎中进行过研究。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这是一项回顾性队列分析,包括2018年2月至2021年11月期间在多个合作的体外受精诊所收集的囊胚活检样本,这些样本来自年龄在45岁以下的欧洲血统准父母,使用自体配子,所有卵母细胞均接受了卵胞浆内单精子注射。使用164个已知倍性状态的胚胎样本(147个二倍体、9个三倍体和8个单倍体)验证倍性水平测定。通过28个阳性对照和97个阴性对照开发并测试了九种常见MD综合征(-4p = 沃尔夫-赫希霍恩综合征,-8q = 朗格-吉迪恩综合征,-1p = 1p36缺失综合征,-22q = 22q11.2缺失综合征,-5p = 猫叫综合征,-15q = 普拉德-威利/安吉尔曼综合征,-11q = 雅各布森综合征,-17p = 史密斯-马吉尼斯综合征)的检测方法。随后,该方法被盲目应用于以下分析:(i)100个先前通过标准PGT-A定义为均一整倍体的双原核(2PN)来源的囊胚;(ii)99个整倍体胚胎,其移植导致妊娠丢失。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:该方法基于对全基因组中选定多态性的靶向二代测序,并在包含MD综合征的关键区域进行富集。通过概率模型分析测序数据(即等位基因频率),该模型估计倍性水平和MD存在的可能性,同时考虑测序噪声和在1000基因组计划数据库的2504个全基因组测序数据中观察到的群体遗传学模式(即连锁不平衡,LD,相关性)。通过单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列基因分型获得的阶段性亲本单倍型分析用于确认MD的存在。
在分析验证阶段,该策略在倍性分类(100%,CI:98.1 - 100%)和八个MD中的六个识别方面均显示出极高的准确性(99.2%,CI:98.5 - 99.8%)。为了基于杂合性缺失(LOH)改善MD检测,根据参考人群中的单倍型频率和LOH发生情况分析常见单倍体块,从而开发了另外两个数学模型。结果,由于可靠性较差,chr1p36和chr4p16.3区域被排除在MD识别之外,同时开发了一种纳入亲本DNA信息的临床工作流程以增强MD的识别。在临床应用阶段,在2PN来源的囊胚中检测到一例三倍体(i),并且在导致流产的移植胚胎活检标本中回顾性鉴定出一个致病性MD(-22q11.21)(ii)。对于后一种情况,基于家系的分析在非携带者父母的不同同胞胚胎(n = 2/5)中发现了相同的MD,表明女性伴侣存在生殖系嵌合体。当根据胚胎的基因构成选择移植胚胎时,该策略可以识别出除非整倍体之外具有倍性异常和/或MD的胚胎,在整倍体胚胎中的估计发生率为1.5%(n = 3/202,95% CI:0.5 - 4.5%)。
局限性、注意事项:需要进行流行病学研究以准确评估植入前胚胎中倍性改变和MDs的发生率,特别是在整倍体流产中。尽管所开发的检测方法具有很高的准确性,但使用亲本DNA来支持诊断调用可以进一步提高检测的精度。
这种新型检测方法通过整合导致基因组疾病的最常见致病性MDs(包括新发和遗传的)显著扩展了PGT-A的临床应用,这些MDs通常在后期通过侵入性产前检测进行评估。从基础研究的角度来看,这种方法将有助于阐明与植入失败和整倍体胚胎妊娠丢失的遗传学相关的基本生物学和临床问题。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究未使用外部资金。S.C.、M.F.、F.C.、P.Z.、I.P.、L.G.、C.P.、M.P.、D.B.、J.J.-A.、D.B.-J.、J.M.-V.和C.R.是Igenomix的员工,C.S.是Igenomix科学委员会主席。A.C.和L.P.是JUNO GENETICS的员工。Igenomix和JUNO GENETICS是提供生殖遗传服务的公司。
无。