Suppr超能文献

社交隔离与脑血管疾病的亚临床血管通路。

Social isolation and subclinical vascular pathways to cerebrovascular disease.

机构信息

Departments of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA.

Departments of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA.

出版信息

Biodemography Soc Biol. 2023 Jan-Mar;68(1):14-31. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2023.2182274. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

Social isolation and lack of social support are risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease (CVD). This study explored the relationship between measures of social support and subclinical measures of CVD risk. 58 healthy adults ages 18 to 85 years participated in this study. The Berkman-Syme Social Network Inventory (SNI) was used to assess social isolation, with higher scores signifying less isolation. Social support was defined using the 12-Item Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL-12) with a higher score signifying higher social support. Subclinical CVD measures included carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid beta-stiffness index, and middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index. Path analysis models for both the SNI and ISEL appraisal domain predicting cfPWV and cerebrovascular pulsatility fit the data well. Path analyses showed significant direct paths from the SNI (β = -.363, t = -2.91) and ISEL appraisal domain (β = -.264, t = -2.05) to cfPWV. From cfPWV, both models revealed significant direct paths to carotid stiffness (β = .488, t = 4.18) to carotid pulse pressure (β = .311, t = 2.45) to MCA pulsatility (β = .527, t = 4.64). Social isolation and appraisal of social support are related to unfavorably higher aortic stiffness, with subsequent detrimental effects on cerebrovascular hemodynamic pulsatility.

摘要

社会隔离和缺乏社会支持是心血管和脑血管疾病(CVD)的风险因素。本研究探讨了社会支持措施与 CVD 风险亚临床指标之间的关系。58 名年龄在 18 至 85 岁之间的健康成年人参与了这项研究。采用 Berkman-Syme 社会网络量表(SNI)评估社会隔离,得分越高表示隔离程度越低。社会支持用 12 项人际关系支持评估量表(ISEL-12)定义,得分越高表示社会支持越高。亚临床 CVD 指标包括颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)、颈动脉 β 硬度指数和大脑中动脉(MCA)搏动指数。SNI 和 ISEL 评估领域的路径分析模型均能很好地拟合 cfPWV 和脑血管搏动的数据。路径分析显示,SNI(β=-.363,t=-2.91)和 ISEL 评估领域(β=-.264,t=-2.05)与 cfPWV 呈显著直接关系。从 cfPWV 开始,两个模型都显示出与颈动脉僵硬(β=.488,t=4.18)、颈动脉搏动压(β=.311,t=2.45)和 MCA 搏动性(β=.527,t=4.64)的显著直接关系。社会隔离和社会支持评估与主动脉僵硬度升高有关,进而对脑血管血流动力学搏动产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Social isolation and subclinical vascular pathways to cerebrovascular disease.社交隔离与脑血管疾病的亚临床血管通路。
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2023 Jan-Mar;68(1):14-31. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2023.2182274. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

4
Association of Social Support With Brain Volume and Cognition.社会支持与脑容量和认知的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121122. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21122.
8
Social Isolation and Memory Decline in Later-life.晚年的社会隔离与记忆衰退
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 14;75(2):367-376. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz152.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验