Shimahara Yusuke, Suzuki Shun, Fujiyoshi Toshiki, Honda Sayaka, Koizumi Nobusato, Yamashita Jun, Sasaki Yuichi, Ito Ryosuke, Takahashi Lisa, Nakai Michikazu, Ogino Hitoshi
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Mar 2;36(3). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad031.
Our goal was to evaluate the combined effects of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) followed by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) to treat high-surgical-risk patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).
This study included 58 patients with CTEPH who had pulmonary vascular resistance of ≥1000 dyn·s/cm5, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of ≥45 mmHg or mPAP of 38-44 mmHg with comorbidities. Of these, 21 patients underwent the combined therapy of BPA followed by PEA (BPA group) and 37 underwent direct PEA (non-BPA group). Preoperative and postoperative results were compared between the 2 groups. An early postoperative composite event comprised the postoperative use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or intra-aortic balloon pump, in-hospital death, rescue BPA, prolonged ventilation, tracheostomy, prolonged stay in the intensive care unit, deep sternal wound infection and cerebral infarction.
Before the first intervention (before BPA or direct PEA), patients in the BPA group had a higher mPAP than those in the non-BPA group. After undergoing BPA before PEA, the BPA group demonstrated significantly decreased mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance (43 vs 52 mmHg, P < 0.001; 636 vs 965 dyn·s/cm5, P = 0.003, respectively) and significantly increased cardiac output (4.1 vs 3.5 l/min, P = 0.041). Notably, the number of patients with the early postoperative composite event was significantly lower in the BPA group than in the non-BPA group (4.8% vs 35.1%, P = 0.011).
Compared with direct PEA, the combination therapy of BPA followed by PEA can be a feasible and effective risk-reduction strategy for high-surgical-risk patients with CTEPH.
我们的目标是评估球囊肺动脉血管成形术(BPA)联合肺动脉内膜剥脱术(PEA)治疗手术风险高的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者的综合效果。
本研究纳入58例CTEPH患者,其肺血管阻力≥1000 dyn·s/cm5,平均肺动脉压(mPAP)≥45 mmHg或mPAP为38 - 44 mmHg且合并其他疾病。其中,21例患者接受了BPA联合PEA的联合治疗(BPA组),37例接受直接PEA(非BPA组)。比较两组术前和术后的结果。术后早期复合事件包括术后使用体外膜肺氧合或主动脉内球囊泵、院内死亡、挽救性BPA、通气时间延长、气管切开、在重症监护病房停留时间延长、胸骨深部伤口感染和脑梗死。
在首次干预前(BPA或直接PEA之前),BPA组患者的mPAP高于非BPA组。在PEA前接受BPA后,BPA组的mPAP和肺血管阻力显著降低(分别为43 vs 52 mmHg,P < 0.001;636 vs 965 dyn·s/cm5,P = 0.003),心输出量显著增加(4.1 vs 3.5 l/min,P = 0.041)。值得注意的是,BPA组术后早期复合事件的患者数量显著低于非BPA组(4.8% vs 35.1%,P = 0.011)。
与直接PEA相比,BPA联合PEA的联合治疗对于手术风险高的CTEPH患者可能是一种可行且有效的降低风险策略。