School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, QLD 4222, Australia; Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, QLD 4222, Australia; Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, QLD 4222, Australia.
Department of Territorial Sciences and Policies (DIST), University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 May 20;874:162408. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162408. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
Nutrient runoff from agriculture practices poses a significant risk to waterway health and can have long-lasting and complex implications for the environment, ecosystems, and the human population. Consequently, a systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) was conducted to identify different nutrient runoff mitigation strategies (NRMS) that are currently used globally to prevent or remediate environmental damage from excessive agricultural fertilisation. Empirical data on the outcomes from various NRMS from the reviewed studies were used to evaluate the strategies based on environmental benefit, implementation cost, and practicality perspectives. An overall assessment of the feasibility of NRMS was determined, and a macro-level assessment of the reported barriers preventing the widespread implementation of NRMS was provided. Identified research gaps and issues included a dearth of literature covering nutrient runoff mitigation, scepticism from agricultural landowners to voluntarily adopt policy without substantial incentives, and a general lack of cost/benefit analyses, including an understanding of the uncertainty associated with NRMS that can inform decision-makers about effective and efficient strategies for different site situations. Synthesis of SQLR data facilitated the development of a comprehensive nutrient runoff decision-making framework which addresses present limitations and provides site-specific NRMS recommendations for policymakers to implement.
农业实践中的养分径流对水道健康构成重大风险,并可能对环境、生态系统和人类人口产生持久而复杂的影响。因此,进行了系统的定量文献综述 (SQLR),以确定目前全球用于防止或补救过度农业施肥造成的环境损害的不同养分径流缓解策略 (NRMS)。从已审查研究中使用有关各种 NRMS 结果的经验数据,根据环境效益、实施成本和实用性角度来评估这些策略。确定了 NRMS 的可行性的总体评估,并提供了对阻止广泛实施 NRMS 的报告障碍的宏观评估。确定的研究差距和问题包括:缺乏涵盖养分径流缓解的文献;农业土地所有者对没有实质性激励的自愿采用政策持怀疑态度;以及普遍缺乏成本/效益分析,包括对与 NRMS 相关的不确定性的理解,这可以为决策者提供有关不同地点情况的有效和高效策略的信息。SQLR 数据的综合促成了一个全面的养分径流决策框架的发展,该框架解决了当前的局限性,并为政策制定者提供了具体地点的 NRMS 建议以进行实施。